The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry (Q34548705)

2 August 2017

The current use of Impella 2.5 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the USpella Registry (English)

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference

myocardial infarction

1 reference

acute myocardial infarction

inferred from title

1 reference

10

E Magnus Ohman

1 reference

2 August 2017

8

Joseph M Massaro

1 reference

2 August 2017

William W O'Neill

1

1 reference

2 August 2017

Theodore Schreiber

2

1 reference

2 August 2017

David H W Wohns

3

1 reference

2 August 2017

Charanjit Rihal

4

1 reference

2 August 2017

Srihari S Naidu

5

1 reference

2 August 2017

Andrew B Civitello

6

1 reference

2 August 2017

Simon R Dixon

7

1 reference

2 August 2017

Brijeshwar Maini

9

1 reference

2 August 2017

13 December 2013

1 reference

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

2 August 2017

1 reference

2 August 2017

27

1 reference

2 August 2017

1

1 reference

2 August 2017

1-11

1 reference

The outcome of intra-aortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis

2 August 2017

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECT II study

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventi

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines?

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock

7 July 2018

1 reference

https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pmc&linkname=pmc_refs_pubmed&retmode=json&id=4238821

Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock

7 July 2018

1 reference

Crossref

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJOIC.12080

Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Crossref

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJOIC.12080

Percutaneous Left-Ventricular Support With the Impella-2.5–Assist Device in Acute Cardiogenic Shock

21 January 2018

1 reference

Crossref

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1111%2FJOIC.12080

Implications of the timing of onset of cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Correlates of one-year survival inpatients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: angiographic findings from the SHOCK trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Effect of multivessel coronary disease with or without concurrent chronic total occlusion on one-year mortality in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock

1 reference

12 December 2020

The Impella 2.5 and 5.0 devices for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients presenting with severe and profound cardiogenic shock: the Academic Medical Center intensive care unit experience

1 reference

12 December 2020

The ability to achieve complete revascularization is associated with improved in-hospital survival in cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: Manitoba cardiogenic SHOCK Registry investigators

1 reference

12 December 2020

Hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the prospective, randomized IABP shock trial

1 reference

12 December 2020

Intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry

1 reference

12 December 2020

Identifiers

DOI

10.1111/JOIC.12080

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference

2 August 2017

1 reference