Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study (Q34917180)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study |
scientific article |
Statements
1 reference
Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study (English)
1 reference
1 reference
Jennifer Tetzlaff
1 reference
Jamie Brehaut
1 reference
Andrea C Tricco
1 reference
Ba' Pham
1 reference
6 January 2009
1 reference
1 reference
Identifiers
1 reference