Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes (Q37276805)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
scientific article published on 20 September 2008
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes |
scientific article published on 20 September 2008 |
Statements
1 reference
Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes (English)
1 reference
Henrik Kehlet
1 reference
Rory McCloy
1 reference
Delia Randall
1 reference
Christian Simanski
1 reference
Francis Bonnet
1 reference
Frederic Camu
1 reference
Barrie Fischer
1 reference
Girish Joshi
1 reference
Narinder Rawal
1 reference
Edmund A M Neugebauer
1 reference
20 September 2008
1 reference
13
0 references
1 reference
22
1 reference
12
1 reference
2541-2553
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
1 reference
Identifiers
1 reference
1 reference