Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes (Q37276805)

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
scientific article published on 20 September 2008
edit
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes
scientific article published on 20 September 2008

    Statements

    Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes (English)
    13
    0 references

    Identifiers

     
    edit
      edit
        edit
          edit
            edit
              edit
                edit
                  edit
                    edit