Radical prostatectomy: does surgical technique influence margin control? (Q37706810)

22 August 2017

1 reference

title

Radical prostatectomy: does surgical technique influence margin control? (English)

1 reference

22 August 2017

Matthew T Gettman

1

1 reference

PubMed ID

20219563

22 August 2017

Michael L Blute

series ordinal

2

1 reference

22 August 2017

1 March 2010

1 reference

22 August 2017

1 reference

22 August 2017

28

1 reference

22 August 2017

2

1 reference

22 August 2017

219-225

1 reference

Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost

22 August 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Is the GPSM scoring algorithm for patients with prostate cancer valid in the contemporary era?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Trends in distribution and prognostic significance of Gleason grades on radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens between 1989 and 2001

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Does year of radical prostatectomy independently predict outcome in prostate cancer?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of specimen pathologic features to critically assess and modify surgical technique.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

The presence of benign prostatic glandular tissue at surgical margins does not predict PSA recurrence.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Obesity and capsular incision at the time of open retropubic radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Benign prostatic glands at surgical margins of radical prostatectomy specimens: frequency and associated risk factors

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Is intraoperative frozen section analysis an efficient way to reduce positive surgical margins?

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Intra- and peri-operative outcomes comparing radical retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a prospective, randomised, single-surgeon study

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Pathologic comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Pathologic outcome of laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Radical Prostatectomy with Bladder Neck Preservation: Impact of a Positive Margin

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing--effects on continence and positive margins

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Complete resection of seminal vesicles at radical prostatectomy results in substantial long-term disease-free survival: multi-institutional study of 6740 patients

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Retained Seminal Vesicles After Radical Prostatectomy: Frequency, MRI Characteristics, and Clinical Relevance

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Modified Extrafascial Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Technique Decreases Frequency of Positive Surgical Margins in T2 Cancers <2 cm 3

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors for Side-Specific Positive Surgical Margins in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Surgical volume is related to the rate of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in European patients

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Do tumor volume, tumor volume ratio, type of nerve sparing and surgical experience affect prostate specific antigen recurrence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy? A matched pair analysis

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Early release of the neurovascular bundles and optical loupe magnification lead to improved and earlier return of potency following radical retropubic prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Increased optical magnification from 2.5x to 4.3x with technical modification lowers the positive margin rate in open radical retropubic prostatectomy.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911).

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

Impact of margin size on the incidence of local residual tumor after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLONC.2009.07.014

10.1016/J.UROLONC.2009.07.014

7 January 2021

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

22 August 2017

1 reference

PubMed ID

20219563