A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods (Q37863111)

24 August 2017

1 reference

title

A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods (English)

1 reference

24 August 2017

Madeleine T King

1

1 reference

24 August 2017

1 April 2011

1 reference

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

24 August 2017

1 reference

24 August 2017

11

1 reference

24 August 2017

171-184

1 reference

24 August 2017

2

1 reference

Approaches and recommendations for estimating minimally important differences for health-related quality of life measures

24 August 2017

1 reference

21 January 2018

1 reference

Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference

21 January 2018

1 reference

Interpretation of quality of life changes

21 January 2018

1 reference

Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials

21 January 2018

1 reference

Commentary--goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change

21 January 2018

1 reference

Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.

21 January 2018

1 reference

How can quality of life researchers make their work more useful to health workers and their patients?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Analysis and interpretation of health-related quality-of-life data from clinical trials: basic approach of The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches.

21 January 2018

1 reference

The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Validation and calibration of the SF-36 health transition question against an external criterion of clinical change in health status.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lo

21 January 2018

1 reference

Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories

21 January 2018

1 reference

Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Understanding global transition assessments.

21 January 2018

1 reference

A comparison of traditional and Rasch cut points for assessing clinically important change in health-related quality of life among patients with asthma.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

21 January 2018

1 reference

The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Interpreting health-related quality of life scores: the simple rule of seven may not be so simple.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Meta-analysis provides evidence-based effect sizes for a cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the FACT-G.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Assessing the minimal important difference in symptoms: a comparison of two techniques.

21 January 2018

1 reference

What changes in health-related quality of life matter to multiple myeloma patients? A prospective study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Interpreting quality-of-life data: methods for community consensus in asthma

21 January 2018

1 reference

Triangulating patient and clinician perspectives on clinically important differences in health-related quality of life among patients with heart disease.

21 January 2018

1 reference

Measuring patient and clinician perspectives to evaluate change in health-related quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

21 January 2018

1 reference

Meta-analysis provides evidence-based interpretation guidelines for the clinical significance of mean differences for the FACT-G, a cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire

21 January 2018

1 reference

Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures

21 January 2018

1 reference

Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research

21 January 2018

1 reference

The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?

21 January 2018

1 reference

Identifying meaningful differences in vasomotor symptoms among menopausal women

21 January 2018

1 reference

Assessing clinical significance in measuring oncology patient quality of life: introduction to the symposium, content overview, and definition of terms

21 January 2018

1 reference

Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

21 January 2018

1 reference

Interpreting differences in quality of life: The FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

Interpreting clinically significant changes in patient-reported outcomes

21 January 2018

1 reference

21 January 2018

Identifiers

DOI

10.1586/ERP.11.9

1 reference

24 August 2017

1 reference

PubMed ID

21476819