Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery (Q38013657)

27 August 2017

Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery (English)

1 reference

27 August 2017

robot-assisted surgery

1 reference

O E O'Sullivan

1

1 reference

PubMed ID

22638668

27 August 2017

B A O'Reilly

series ordinal

2

1 reference

27 August 2017

26 May 2012

1 reference

International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

27 August 2017

1 reference

27 August 2017

23

1 reference

27 August 2017

9

1 reference

27 August 2017

1163-1173

1 reference

https://scigraph.springernature.com/pub.10.1007/s00192-012-1790-3

27 August 2017

0 references

cites work

Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Laparoscopic robotic gynecologic surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: establishment of a learning curve

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Medium-term anatomic and functional results of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy beyond the learning curve

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Single-port laparoscopic abdominal sacral colpopexy: initial experience and comparative outcomes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Laparoscopic hysteropexy: the initial results of a uterine suspension procedure for uterovaginal prolapse

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Laparoscopic vesicovaginal fistula repair with robotic reconstruction.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic repair of vesicovaginal fistula: case series of five patients.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparison of robotic-assisted surgery outcomes with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging in Turkey

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

From open radical hysterectomy to robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: aspects of a single institution learning curve

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparison of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese patients

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Evaluation of the introduction of robotic technology on route of hysterectomy and complications in the first year of use.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A comparison of robot-assisted and traditional radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Surgical staging of endometrial cancer: robotic versus open technique outcomes in a contemporary single surgeon series

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison of outcomes and cost

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparison of outcomes between laparotomy and robotic technique for cervical cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the f

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic tubal anastomosis: surgical technique and cost effectiveness

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic adnexectomy compared with laparoscopy for adnexal mass

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Role of robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparing robot-assisted with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: impact on cost and clinical outcomes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

The development of health technology assessment

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Health care technology as a policy issue

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Assessment of the durability of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

An evaluation of knot integrity when tied robotically and conventionally.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current outcomes.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Randomized trials in robotic surgery: a practical impossibility?

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008.

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

Robot-assisted laparoscopic cervical cerclage as an interval procedure

21 January 2018

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1007%2FS00192-012-1790-3

A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy.

21 January 2018

1 reference

12 December 2020

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Hysteropexy. A review.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience

1 reference

12 December 2020

Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience

1 reference

12 December 2020

Anterior vaginal mesh sacrospinous hysteropexy and posterior fascial plication for anterior compartment dominated uterovaginal prolapse

1 reference

12 December 2020

Sacrohysteropexy followed by successful pregnancy and eventual reoperation for prolapse

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse

1 reference

12 December 2020

Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy

1 reference

12 December 2020

A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.

1 reference

12 December 2020

Laparoscopic sacral suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse

1 reference

12 December 2020

Gynaecologic robot-assisted cancer and endoscopic surgery (GRACES) in a tertiary referral centre

1 reference

12 December 2020

10.1007/S00192-012-1790-3

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

PubMed ID

22638668

Dimensions Publication ID

27 August 2017

0 references

1 reference

PubMed ID

22638668