Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial (Q40879203)

24 September 2017

Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial (English)

1 reference

24 September 2017

C Snowdon

1

1 reference

24 September 2017

J Garcia

series ordinal

2

1 reference

24 September 2017

D Elbourne

series ordinal

3

1 reference

24 September 2017

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 November 1997

1 reference

Social Science and Medicine

24 September 2017

1 reference

24 September 2017

45

1 reference

24 September 2017

9

1 reference

24 September 2017

1337-1355

1 reference

Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.

24 September 2017

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Recruitment for an efficacy study in chemoprevention--the Concerned Smoker Study.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Informed consent in psychiatric research: preliminary findings from an ongoing investigation

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Patients' attitudes to participation in clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Informed consent: ethical, legal, and medical implications for doctors and patients who participate in randomised clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Minimizing harm and maximizing benefit during innovation in health care: controlled or uncontrolled experimentation?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Randomisation and patient choice

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Offering patients entry in clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Advising AIDS patients who participate in clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Informed consent. Consent difficult in paediatric oncology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Sociodemographic and motivational characteristics of parents who volunteer their children for clinical research: a controlled study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

"Uniformed" consent and the wealthy volunteer: an analysis of patient volunteers in a clinical trial of a new anti-inflammatory drug

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Patient perception of a long-term clinical trial: experience using a close-out questionnaire in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trial. SOLVD Close-out Working Group

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Shared understandings for informed consent: the relevance of psychological research on the provision of information.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

The ethics of randomization

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Is informed consent in neonatal randomised controlled trials ritual?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

On the nature and ethics of phase I clinical trials of cancer chemotherapies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Patients' willingness to enter clinical trials: measuring the association with perceived benefit and preference for decision participation.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Clinical trials in cancer: the role of surrogate patients in defining what constitutes an ethically acceptable clinical experiment

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Participation in a clinical trial: the patients' point of view

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Informed consent in clinical trials. Strengthen ethical committees' role

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Patients' understanding of consent form should be checked before participation in trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Risk factor and behavioral correlates of willingness to participate in cancer prevention trials.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Informed consent in clinical trials. Informed consent difficult in paediatric intensive care

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Informed consent for investigational chemotherapy: patients' and physicians' perceptions

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Reasons for entry into and understanding of HIV/AIDS clinical trials: a preliminary study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

'Going public' and 'watching sick people'--the clinic setting as a factor in the experiences of gay men participating in AIDS clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Danish patients' attitudes to scientific-ethical questions. An interview study focusing therapeutic trials.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

The ethics of the randomized clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Redressing the balance--the ethics of not entering an eligible patient on a randomised clinical trial

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Volunteers or victims: patients' views of randomised cancer clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Participation in biomedical research: the consent process as viewed by children, adolescents, young adults, and physicians

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

A study of diet and breast cancer prevention in Canada: why healthy women participate in controlled trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Integrating conflicting professional roles: physician participation in randomized clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Physicians' reasons for not entering eligible patients in a randomized clinical trial of surgery for breast cancer

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Fundamental dilemmas of the randomized clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Clinical trials--a brave new partnership?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Randomized controlled trials of potentially life-saving therapies: are they ethical?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

Is it any good? The evaluation of therapy by participants in a clinical trial.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

A New Design for Randomized Clinical Trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0277-9536%2897%2900063-4

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00063-4

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

24 September 2017

1 reference