Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (Q47299766)

13 January 2018

title

Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (English)

1 reference

13 January 2018

author name string

Kevin C Zorn

1

1 reference

13 January 2018

Marcelo A Orvieto

2

1 reference

13 January 2018

Albert A Mikhail

3

1 reference

13 January 2018

Ofer N Gofrit

4

1 reference

13 January 2018

Shang Lin

5

1 reference

13 January 2018

Anthony J Schaeffer

6

1 reference

13 January 2018

Arieh L Shalhav

7

1 reference

13 January 2018

Gregory P Zagaja

8

1 reference

13 January 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 February 2007

1 reference

13 January 2018

published in

Urology

1 reference

13 January 2018

volume

69

1 reference

13 January 2018

issue

2

1 reference

13 January 2018

page(s)

300-305

1 reference

13 January 2018

A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Hepatic resection: the last surgical frontier for colorectal cancer

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy--an analysis of factors affecting operating time.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology.

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Minor modifications in apical dissection of radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with clinical stage T2 prostate cancer reduce positive surgical margin incidence

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Prospective assessment of incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: objective and subjective analysis

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence

7 January 2021

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FJ.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

inferred from DOI database lookup

7 January 2021

based on heuristic

Identifiers

DOI

10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2006.10.021

1 reference

13 January 2018

PubMed ID

17320668

1 reference

13 January 2018