Why follow-back studies should be interpreted cautiously: The case of an HPV-negative cervical lesion (Q50965956)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
scientific article published on 10 September 2015
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Why follow-back studies should be interpreted cautiously: The case of an HPV-negative cervical lesion |
scientific article published on 10 September 2015 |
Statements
Why follow-back studies should be interpreted cautiously: The case of an HPV-negative cervical lesion (English)
1 reference
Joakim Dillner
1 reference
Chris J L M Meijer
1 reference
Peter J F Snijders
1 reference
Guglielmo Ronco
1 reference
K Miriam Elfström
1 reference
Marc Arbyn
1 reference
Johannes Berkhof
1 reference
Annarosa Del Mistro
1 reference
Silvia De Sanjosè
1 reference
Xavier Bosch
1 reference
Karl Ulrich Petry
1 reference
Mario Poljak
1 reference
Carlo Naldoni
1 reference
Comparing Health Services Interventions for the Prevention of HPV-Related Cancer Consortium
1 reference
New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Group
1 reference
10 September 2015
1 reference
124
1 reference
1
1 reference
66-67
1 reference