Stepped defibrillation waveform is substantially more efficient than the 50/50% tilt biphasic. (Q51094963)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
scientific article published on 25 August 2006
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Stepped defibrillation waveform is substantially more efficient than the 50/50% tilt biphasic. |
scientific article published on 25 August 2006 |
Statements
Stepped defibrillation waveform is substantially more efficient than the 50/50% tilt biphasic. (English)
1 reference
Mark W Kroll
1 reference
Karlheinz Seidl
1 reference
Russell A Denman
1 reference
J Christopher Moulder
1 reference
Gabriel Mouchawar
1 reference
Christoph Stoeppler
1 reference
Torsten Becker
1 reference
Udo Weise
1 reference
Emma J Anskey
1 reference
Helen E Burnett
1 reference
25 August 2006
1 reference
3
1 reference
12
1 reference
1406-1411
1 reference
Identifiers
1 reference