What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (Q52925799)

9 May 2018

title

What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (English)

1 reference

9 May 2018

0 references

1

1 reference

9 May 2018

Alessandro Liberati

7

object named as

Liberati A

1 reference

9 May 2018

Pham B

2

1 reference

9 May 2018

Klassen TP

3

1 reference

9 May 2018

Schulz KF

4

1 reference

9 May 2018

Berlin JA

5

1 reference

9 May 2018

Jadad AR

6

1 reference

9 May 2018

publication date

1 September 2000

1 reference

9 May 2018

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

published in

1 reference

9 May 2018

volume

53

1 reference

9 May 2018

page(s)

964-972

1 reference

9 May 2018

issue

9

1 reference

9 May 2018

Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias?

cites work

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Validation of an index of the quality of review articles

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis of smooth muscle relaxants in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. II: Replicate variability and comparison of studies that agree and disagree

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: an overview of the randomized trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Identification of meta-analyses. The need for standard terminology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research: overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measure.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? University of Pennsylvania Meta-analysis Blinding Study Group

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Pharmacological management of intermittent claudication: a meta-analysis of randomised trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Effect of selective decontamination of the digestive tract on respiratory tract infections and mortality in the intensive care unit

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of selective decontamination of the digestive tract. Selective Decontamination of the Digestive Tract Trialists' Collaborative Group

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

Review of randomised controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0895-4356%2800%2900188-8

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00188-8

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

9 May 2018

PubMed ID

11004423

1 reference

9 May 2018