Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. (Q53645232)

16 May 2018

title

Grey zones of clinical practice: some limits to evidence-based medicine. (English)

1 reference

16 May 2018

main subject

evidence-based medicine

1 reference

C D Naylor

1

1 reference

16 May 2018

language of work or name

English

0 references

publication date

1 April 1995

1 reference

16 May 2018

published in

The Lancet

1 reference

16 May 2018

volume

345

1 reference

16 May 2018

issue

8953

1 reference

16 May 2018

page(s)

840-842

1 reference

16 May 2018

cites work

What physicians know.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

Physician ratings of appropriate indications for three procedures: theoretical indications vs indications used in practice

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

The effect of comorbidity on appropriateness ratings for two gastrointestinal procedures.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

Diagnosis and treatment of coronary disease: comparison of doctors' attitudes in the USA and the UK.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

When does consensus exist in expert panels?

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

The methodologic foundations of studies of the appropriateness of medical care.

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

The role of evidence in the consensus process. Results from a Canadian consensus exercise

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

Decision analysis: a progress report

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

Use of carotid endarterectomy in five California Veterans Administration medical centers

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

The appropriateness of hysterectomy. A comparison of care in seven health plans. Health Maintenance Organization Quality of Care Consortium

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

The appropriateness of use of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

The appropriateness of the use of cardiovascular procedures. British versus U.S. perspectives

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State

1 reference

https://api.crossref.org/works/10.1016%2FS0140-6736%2895%2992969-X

7 January 2021

10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92969-X

Identifiers

DOI

1 reference

16 May 2018

1 reference

16 May 2018