Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task (Q84603694)

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
scientific article published on 29 September 2009
edit
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task
scientific article published on 29 September 2009

    Statements

    Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I (English)

    Identifiers

     
    edit
      edit
        edit
          edit
            edit
              edit
                edit
                  edit
                    edit