Talk:Q1516555
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — intersectionality (Q1516555)
description: theoretical framework of multidimensional oppression
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “intersectionality” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- intersectionality (Q1516555)
- gender studies (Q1662673)
- jurisprudence (Q4932206)
- political sociology (Q745692)
- social movement (Q49773)
- group action (Q3533467)
- collective behavior (Q2548752)
- group behaviour (Q3482410)
- social behavior (Q921513)
- animal behaviour (Q2990593)
- biological process involved in intraspecies interaction between organisms (Q22294683)
- social behavior (Q921513)
- group behaviour (Q3482410)
- social change (Q1510761)
- →(¶) social process (Q2305441)
- intersectionality (Q1516555)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
intersectionality⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Subclassing[edit]
At the moment of writing, intersectionality is stated to be a subclass of gender studies, political sociology, jurisprudence and social movement. I assume it should rather be part of for gender studies and political sociology. Ideally, it would also be instanceOf a Sociological Concept(which does not exist), just as gravity is a physical phenomenon. I don't know what jurisprudence and social movement would be here (Intersectional Feminism is a social movement, intersectionality itself probably not) --Simulo (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)