Talk:Q176287
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — Timaeus of Locri (Q176287)
description: character in Plato's dialogues; purported ancient Greek philosopher
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Timaeus of Locri” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Generic queries for authors
This section is generated with {{Generic queries for authors}}
.
- List of works written by Timaeus of Locri (query)
- List of works authored by Timaeus of Locri, ordered by sitelinks (query)
- List of works written by Timaeus of Locri with instance of property (query)
- List of written works he/she has authored with genre property (query)
- Timeline of Timaeus of Locri (query)
- Narrative location of works written by Timaeus of Locri (query)
- Map of narrative location of works written by Timaeus of Locri (query)
- List of co-authors, sorted by number of collaborations (query)
- Graph of co-authors (query)
- See also : Synia#author : Timaeus of Locri
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
Identity
[edit]In many external identifiers, as well as Wikipedias, there is a conflation between Timaeus of Locri (Q176287) as a pythagorean philosopher and a character of Plato's Timaeus (Q371884), and Pseudo-Timaeus of Locri (Q95905372) as the author of the treaty On the nature of the world and the soul (Q108370206). Obviously the first one is necessarily born some time before the writing of Timaeus (Q371884), if he is not entirely fictionnal, while the second, as a commentator of this very work, must have lived after it was published. --Jahl de Vautban (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Epìdosis, It seems that the info date of birth (P569) says " third century BC" is about Pseudo-Timaeus of Locri (Q95905372) (date of death (P570) as well). Can you fix it. Geagea (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Geagea: Sure,
moved. @Jahl de Vautban: Regarding IDs, there is effectively a big mess; if you agree, I think probably the best solution would be moving most of the IDs (except those explicitly referring to the Platonic character) to the pseudo-author. --Epìdosis 20:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Epi. I do agree that moving to the pseudo-author, it's a good solution. Geagea (talk) 20:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Epìdosis: yes, I agree. In all probability the libraries at least have in mind the author of the treaty, whoever he is. --Jahl de Vautban (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Done, I have just left here DNB and SUDOC because they explicitly mention 5th century BCE. --Epìdosis 07:56, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Epìdosis: yes, I agree. In all probability the libraries at least have in mind the author of the treaty, whoever he is. --Jahl de Vautban (talk) 06:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Epi. I do agree that moving to the pseudo-author, it's a good solution. Geagea (talk) 20:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Geagea: Sure,