Talk:Q19088
Autodescription — eukaryote (Q19088)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “eukaryote” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
eukaryote⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
Union and disjoint queries
- Instances of eukaryote (Q19088)
that are instances of two (or more) of the classes: [1] - Instances of eukaryote (Q19088) that are instances of none of the classes protist (Q10892) , plant (Q756) , fungus (Q764) and animal (Q729) [2]
- Instances of eukaryote (Q19088) that are instances of two (or more) of the classes: [3]
- Instances of eukaryote (Q19088) that are instances of none of the classes protist (Q10892) , Chromista (Q862296) , plant (Q756) , fungus (Q764) and animal (Q729) [4]
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
iNaturalist
[edit]@Succu: If you search for Eukaryote on iNaturalist you get shown one item for which that taxon name is linked to, "Life". The link for the item redirects to "www.inaturalist.org/taxa", however if you copy the link it is http://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/48460-Life; clearly displying that there is an id, only that they do not keep a "record" for it. It is therefore a deprecated ID, but an external ID nonetheless. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- An ID points to a clearly distinguished concept and not to redirs of all kinds. --Succu (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- No, but since they have an id-number for it, it should be linked/mentioned. They may change their display of it in the future, but in the meantime, it should be kep, but makred as depricated. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- Even if they have a visual webpage for the ID or not, does not mean it is not an ID. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- No, but since they have an id-number for it, it should be linked/mentioned. They may change their display of it in the future, but in the meantime, it should be kep, but makred as depricated. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:10, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
Taxon range map image causing issues on sv-wiki
[edit]Can someone remove the taxon range map image-statement due to it causing isssues with non-existent files with the wikidata-template on sv wiki. --ExplainsTrains (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2022 (UTC)