Talk:Q19159
Autodescription — Tetrapoda (Q19159)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Tetrapoda” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
Tetrapoda⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
Union and disjoint queries
- Instances of Tetrapoda (Q19159)
that are instances of none of the classes Batrachomorpha (Q2521462) and Reptiliomorpha (Q134683) [1]
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
I am working on a project to create graphs of how clades are related (https://github.com/boxed/related_how) and I'm pretty far along, but I've found Tetrapoda to be weirdly classified... why is Sarcopterygii not listed as a parent taxon? I have other data issues, but this seems the worst to me, being a member of Sarcopterygii myself :P --Boxed (talk) 00:10, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Edit request: removal of parent taxon Labyrinthodontia[edit]
{{editprotected}}
I believe the Tetrapoda should have the Labyrinthodontia parent taxon removed. The Labyrinthodontia relation is not mentioned on the equivalent Wikipedia page. This parent taxon relation causes a circular taxonomy: Tetrapoda to Labyrinthodontia to Amphibia and back to Tetrapoda. WalrusTheSailor (talk) 08:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Done by Andreasmperu -- Ahmad Kanik 💬 13:33, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
