Talk:Q20026824
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — plant fiber (Q20026824)
description: fiber from fiber plants
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “plant fiber” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
plant fiber⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
question
[edit]@Brya: I'm not an expert but it seem this item is a potential duplicate of fiber plant (Q1147096) 
(same name when I wanted to find a name in french). The title of the french article linked to this item is vegetable fiber (word to word translation). What do you think ? TomT0m (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- A vegetable fiber usually is the product of fiber crops, and fiber crops are a source of vegetable fibers. - Brya (talk) 19:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Brya: That does not solve my problem :) I see in several languages fibro vegetale fibroplanto or equivalent and so on, not about cropping. How do we separate those links and clean all of this ? It think it would be easier to merge this item and create a new one about crops, seeing the article names. TomT0m (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- A vegetable fiber usually is the product of fiber crops, and fiber crops are a source of vegetable fibers. - Brya (talk) 19:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Merging serves no purpose. The enwiki and dewiki pages are on the crop, while the frwiki page is on the fiber. As such things go this look to be very easy to sort out. - Brya (talk) 19:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Brya: What do you mean ? TomT0m (talk) 19:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- Changing the labels and description in several languages is not easy. We better try to minimise the need of such operations. My impression is that there is more larticle for the fiber, so probably more labels. TomT0m (talk) 19:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- See. It was just the one page on dietary fibers that was out of line. - Brya (talk) 05:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)