Talk:Q200928
Autodescription — electric power transmission (Q200928)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “electric power transmission” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
electric power transmission⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Move[edit]
be, be-x-old, ru, uk, sv should be considered for move to Q20087728. (In russian: решить вопрос с переносом статей о "Линия электропередачи", т. к. тут рассматривается передача электроэнергии, а не элемент инфраструктуры. Проверить, о чём другие статьи, т.к. например enwiki не имеет отдельной статьи о power line). --Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Correct structure?[edit]
electric power distribution (Q844861) and electric power transmission (Q200928) should follow the same general ontology, but they are completely different.
I thought if I include a couple more similar items it may show a clear pattern, but it just gets worse:
Ideally there should be some consistency. I suggest:
- instance of (P31) - unsure - it's not always commercial so business sector (Q3477367) or economic activity (Q8187769) may not suit.
- part of (P361) - all set to energy industry (Q2151621)
- subclass of (P279) - all except retailing set to energy infrastructure (Q56397239)
- different from (P1889) - [for each item, include the other three items]
Raising for discussion here before I go making a faux pas with the structure!