Talk:Q234963

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Municipis sense l'article de la Viquipèdia enllaçat
Formentera no cal arreglar-ho, perquè l'article sobre l'illa ja inclou el municipi. (Help)
Violations query: select distinct ?item where { ?item wdt:P31 ?instancia . ?instancia wdt:P279* wd:Q15284. ?item wdt:P131*/wdt:P361/wdt:P361? wd:Q234963. minus { ?item ^schema:about/schema:isPartOf <https://ca.wikipedia.org/> } minus { ?instancia wdt:P279* wd:Q19730508 } minus { ?item p:P31 ?statement . ?statement ps:P31 ?instancia . ?statement pq:P582 [] . } }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/Q234963#Municipis sense l'article de la Viquipèdia enllaçat
Municipis sense província
(Help)
Violations query: select distinct ?item where { ?item wdt:P31/wdt:P279? wd:Q2074737 . ?item wdt:P131*/wdt:P361/wdt:P361? wd:Q234963. minus { ?item wdt:P131+/wdt:P31 wd:Q162620 } }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/Q234963#Municipis sense província
Municipis amb més d'una província
(Help)
Violations query: select distinct ?item ?provincia1 ?provincia2 where { ?item wdt:P31/wdt:P279? wd:Q2074737 . ?item wdt:P131*/wdt:P361/wdt:P361? wd:Q234963. ?item wdt:P131+ ?provincia1. ?item wdt:P131+ ?provincia2. ?provincia1 wdt:P31 wd:Q162620. ?provincia2 wdt:P31 wd:Q162620. filter (?provincia1 != ?provincia2) }
List of this constraint violations: Database reports/Complex constraint violations/Q234963#Municipis amb més d'una província

Construct

[edit]

@Asqueladd: Two opinion articles are not reliable sources to add an information. The fact that the Catalan (Q7026) is spoken in Catalan Countries (Q234963) is well referenced. So Catalan Countries (Q234963) is not a construct (Q659390). Jove reverted your edit correctly. Please stop changing it. --Foguera (talk) 09:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What are you on about? I don't think we're on the same plane of reality. This is wikidata and includes... data, referenced from external sources. If you don't like referenced data (even—mainly—from databases, go figure about "authorative sources" then, LOL), you have the door. This is not a place to have editorial discussions about the sex of the angels. Are you sure you don't have mistaken the Wikimedia Project?--Asqueladd (talk) 09:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Help:Sources#Different types of sources. Opinion articles are not books, scientific articles, databases or news. --Foguera (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That rebellion link is indeed a newspaper, news... so go cry around a corner if you want. But preserve the citation.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's an opinion article, like the other reference. It's mainly written in first person, in the begging he says "La observación -excelente en mi opinión- ...", etc. It's a clear example of an opinion article. --Foguera (talk) 07:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]