Talk:Q25428

Autodescription — voltage (Q25428)

description: line integral of the electric field strength

Useful links:

Pretty display of data  (with Wikidata:Reasonator)
Pretty display of data (with Wikidata:Sqid)
View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
Scholia
Report on constraint conformation of “voltage” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
Number of statements about voltage by property (query)
All claims about voltage (query)
List of items with same label (query)
List of lexemes with sense voltage (query)

Classification of the class voltage (Q25428)  

For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.

Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)

Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)

⟨voltage⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1)

Generic queries for classes

See also

This documentation is generated using {{Item documentation}}.

Definition formula

@Toni 001: is this new non-descriptive formula true? Unfortunately you refer to commercial standard and pay-wall doesn't allow to check it. But previous formula was more logical and descriptive. Infovarius (talk) 10:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source IEC 80000-6:2022 Quantities and units — Part 6: Electromagnetism (Q117847945) states about voltage / electric tension: "for a conductor, ... quantity given by the electric potential difference

V_{\mathrm {a} \mathrm {b} }

... between two points

\mathrm {a}

and

\mathrm {b}

respectively" Toni 001 (talk) 05:48, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the circuit theory definition to a new item voltage (Q118309876) and restored the formula for the more general case. Toni 001 (talk) 06:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this seems to be better solution. --Infovarius (talk) 18:45, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Q25428

Autodescription — voltage (Q25428)

Definition formula

Navigation menu

Search