Talk:Q25670
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — digital object identifier (Q25670)
description: ISO standard unique string identifier for a digital object
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “digital object identifier” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- digital object identifier (Q25670)
- OID (Q1781028) ⊸
- ISO standard (Q15087423)
- international standard (Q1334738)
- industry standard (Q2680559)
- →(@) technical standard (Q317623)
- document (Q49848) (#)→
- convention (Q367293)
- →(‡) class (Q16889133)
- service (Q7406919)
- reference work (Q13136)
- regulation (Q428148)
- →(@) technical standard (Q317623)
- →(##) written work (Q47461344)
- digital object identifier (Q25670)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
digital object identifier⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
format as a regular expression[edit]
Do we want to have format as a regular expression (P1793) for DOI? According to this article would match 99.3% of DOI with /^10.\d{4,9}/[-._;()/:A-Z0-9]+$/i. There might be other options based on this discussion on StackOverflow.
In any case, do we want a regexp for DOI? It seems to me like a desirable feature.