Talk:Q29075123
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — value same as Wikidata (Q29075123)
description: state of a wikimedia template call parameter that identical to the value automatically pulled from Wikidata by the template
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “value same as Wikidata” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- value same as Wikidata (Q29075123)
- Wikidata internal entity (Q21281405)
- value same as Wikidata (Q29075123)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
value same as Wikidata⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
scope[edit]
Can’t describe this item. Scope and purpose ? author TomT0m / talk page 14:02, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- as you can see from the uses, it is used as a part of "main article" for a bunch of categories. --Infovarius (talk) 14:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Infovarius: « it is used as a part of "main article" for a bunch of categories » Sorry, I can’t make sense out of these words. Instances of this items are parts of the subject of main articles of some wikipedia categories ?? author TomT0m / talk page 15:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
- @TomT0m: for example, main topic Category:Finnish MP ID same as Wikidata (Q21292795) is Finnish MP ID value same as Wikidata (Q29075123). --Infovarius (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, this seems to be a big mess with random properties used not exactly how they are supposed to be used :( I guess you meant « it is used as value for "main article"», which is clearer (it’s used as a part of the statement built with the property, not as part of the property). Hard to guess what all of this is about @Shinnin: Why is this used as value for « category main subject ?». Is it not more appropriate to create a subclass of « wikimedia maintenance category », such as « wikimedia id value tracking category » ? To be clearer about the usage, I think I’d use a statement such as use Search : data curation (Q15088675) (or something like ) author TomT0m / talk page 11:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- According to a constraint in category for value same as Wikidata (P3734), this item should be used as a value for category combines topics (P971). I haven't created that constraint, I've just followed it. I don't think this is used for category's main topic (P301). Shinnin (talk) 11:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Of course, I meant P971, not P301. I hoped that was obvious (because I indicated two topics). --Infovarius (talk) 07:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- According to a constraint in category for value same as Wikidata (P3734), this item should be used as a value for category combines topics (P971). I haven't created that constraint, I've just followed it. I don't think this is used for category's main topic (P301). Shinnin (talk) 11:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, this seems to be a big mess with random properties used not exactly how they are supposed to be used :( I guess you meant « it is used as value for "main article"», which is clearer (it’s used as a part of the statement built with the property, not as part of the property). Hard to guess what all of this is about @Shinnin: Why is this used as value for « category main subject ?». Is it not more appropriate to create a subclass of « wikimedia maintenance category », such as « wikimedia id value tracking category » ? To be clearer about the usage, I think I’d use a statement such as use Search : data curation (Q15088675) (or something like ) author TomT0m / talk page 11:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- @TomT0m: for example, main topic Category:Finnish MP ID same as Wikidata (Q21292795) is Finnish MP ID value same as Wikidata (Q29075123). --Infovarius (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Infovarius: « it is used as a part of "main article" for a bunch of categories » Sorry, I can’t make sense out of these words. Instances of this items are parts of the subject of main articles of some wikipedia categories ?? author TomT0m / talk page 15:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)