Talk:Q3478658
Autodescription — knowledge representation and reasoning (Q3478658)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “knowledge representation and reasoning” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- knowledge representation and reasoning (Q3478658)
- artificial intelligence (Q11660)
- computer science (Q21198)
- emerging technology (Q120208)
- reasoning (Q1156402)
- artificial intelligence (Q11660)
- knowledge representation and reasoning (Q3478658)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
knowledge representation and reasoning
⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
split with knowledge representation (Q109642276)
[edit]I've spit this entity with knowledge representation (Q109642276). Now knowledge representation and reasoning (Q3478658) is the artificial intelligence sub-discipline studying knowledge representation while knowledge representation (Q109642276) is knowledge representation, i.e. the set of tools used to represent human knowledge (like drawings, diagrams, maps, etc). I did this because this entity were used with both meaning, which broke the ontology. For example, metaclass (Q19478619) was a "part of" this entity, which was incorrect (metaclass (Q19478619) is not part of a discipline, but at best used or studied by a discipline). Also, the French Wikipedia article which was linked to this entity was about the set of tools used to represent human knowledge (like drawings, diagrams, maps, etc), and not about artificial intelligence. CaLéValab (talk) 14:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)