Talk:Q35059
Autodescription — width (Q35059)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “width” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- width (Q35059)
- length (Q36253)
- scalar quantity (Q181175) (@)→
- geometric measure (Q123410660)
- general quantity (Q71758646) ⊸
- scalar quantity (Q181175) (@)→
- geometric property (Q63344712)
- measure (Q192276)
- additive function (Q95744479)
- content (Q5165061)
- →(⁋) function (Q11348)
- →(¤) quantity (Q309314)
- distance (Q126017)
- length (Q36253)
- width (Q35059)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
width⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
ISO source[edit]
Hello @Tacsipacsi: About your question "and what about sources?". We have those two very similar items width (Q35059) and breadth (Q77835705). (Some might claim they are the same, but some dictionaries make a slight distinction.) The latter one is linked to item 3-1.2 in Q26711932, but not the former one. So, while migrating the symbols to the new property, I dropped the source from the former. I acknowledge that sources on individual symbols are sparse and I dropped some (but added new sources in other cases), but I'm working on adding comprehensive sources to any quantity-related statement anyway. (PS: I think that questions are best asked on a talk page, not in a revert.) Toni 001 (talk) 17:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Toni 001: Sorry for not contacting you on talk page. I reverted your edit because it seemed pretty obvious for me that you simply forgot about moving the references with the statements. There are many bots (which often operate under a non-bot account here on Wikidata) that leave out the references when moving values from one property to another. Now it’s clear what your intention was. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 22:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Toni 001 (talk) 10:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
German label[edit]
Regarding the German label, we discussed it on Commons and agree that "Breite" is the best label for this item. Toni 001 (talk) 12:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)