Talk:Q3546082
Autodescription — list of taxonomic terms that include "type" (Q3546082)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “list of taxonomic terms that include "type"” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
Interwiki conflict | |||
Items involved: Q3707858Talk, Q13175754Talk, Q12041019Talk, Q3546082Talk | Status: resolved | ||
nomenclature type / in zoology / in botany / type specimen. Infovarius (talk) 09:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
This ruwiki page is somewhat odd. At first this looks like something that should be merged with type (Q3707858), but on deeper look (with the help of Google Translate) this turns out to list the differenbt categories of type specimens, and the structure at ru: seems to be that this is essentially a subpage of their ru:Номенклатурный тип page. Circeus (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
@Brya: I don't understand your last edits, can you explain ? author TomT0m / talk page 19:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see what is to explain. The ruwiki page is "random list of terms used in biology". It is not a subpage of anything, but stands on it own. Let's just hope nobody translates it. - Brya (talk) 19:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Brya: Then your instance of (P31) statement does not mean anything and is incorrect. Please don't use it as a wp category. Can you for sure know it's not a list of types as we thought ? author TomT0m / talk page 19:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see what is to explain. The ruwiki page is "random list of terms used in biology". It is not a subpage of anything, but stands on it own. Let's just hope nobody translates it. - Brya (talk) 19:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is perfecty clear that the ruwiki page is a "random list of terms used in biology". - Brya (talk) 19:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- If you don't speak Russian, please don't say nonsense. --Infovarius (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Could please you explain why "Типовы́е экземпля́ры" is using plural (Q146786)? --Succu (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Good punch (could be). May be it's not consistent. I suppose it is because it describes different types of this class. --Infovarius (talk) 08:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Could please you explain why "Типовы́е экземпля́ры" is using plural (Q146786)? --Succu (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Infovarius: If you don't have any knowledge of the topic, please don't speak nonsense. - Brya (talk) 04:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- If you don't speak Russian, please don't say nonsense. --Infovarius (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- It is perfecty clear that the ruwiki page is a "random list of terms used in biology". - Brya (talk) 19:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
content of the ru article
[edit]@Infovarius, Ivan A. Krestinin: Can you say more about the content of the page ? author TomT0m / talk page 19:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- list of taxonomic terms that include "type" (Q3546082) is about instance/sample of organism that was saved and used for the first taxon description. For example sample from herbarium. The article describes different types of such samples and terminology. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 20:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
- I don't agree with changes which have done this item a list. Ru-article is not a list. --Infovarius (talk) 23:56, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is subclass of type (Q3707858) used for species rank and below. @Brya:, "random"?? --Infovarius (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- See above. - Brya (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- See above, but there is no useful information. All info is in this section. Before your replica. --Infovarius (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- See above. - Brya (talk) 05:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
- I agree it is not a typical list, but it is not clear what the exact relationship with Номенклатурный тип is. Both pages contain quite good points, as well as obviously untrue points. However, it is clear that this page does list terms, and that these terms have no particular relationship with type specimens.
- If it is desirable to have more than one page, it would make most sense to have separate pages on 'botany' and zoology. - Brya (talk) 05:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- As you can see in ru:Номенклатурный тип, type (Q3707858) can be list of taxonomic terms that include "type" (Q3546082) (for species and below), type species (Q252730) (for genus), type genus (Q842832) (for family) and some others. All items which you are editwarring are of the first class as they are some thing on which species description can be based. --Infovarius (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2017 (UTC)