Talk:Q40984492

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Autodescription — never (Q40984492)

description: opposite of any temporal object
Useful links:
See also


Antipod (for temporal entity)?[edit]

non-temporal entity? --Fractaler (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, opposite of (P461) claims in every direction are here. d1g (talk) 12:03, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But "never" is adverb, "non-temporal entity" or "temporal entity" - noun. --Fractaler (talk) 12:08, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see problem here; adverbs of time would be opposite to time. d1g (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Transitivity requires compliance with rules part of speech (Q82042). "adverbs of time" is adverb (Q380057), and time (Q11471) is sequence (Q20937557). Opposite to time is a absence/lack of time (non-time), "absence/lack of sequence (Q20937557)". Never's antonyms:all the time, always, consistently, constantly, continually, continuously, ever. Otherwise chaos is obtained. --Fractaler (talk) 12:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


d1g (talk) 13:14, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We have: "A" is antipod of "B", or = "A" is antipod of "nonA" (B=nonA), or = "A" is "absence of B"; antipod of B is nonB (nonB=A). In any case, there is an "analogue of universe (Q597663)" that includes subsets of both A and B. But to include subsets A and B, they must be one part of the speech. Here the set (as part of the structure of "Subset->Set->Superset") can not contain both adverbs and nouns. Or only adverbs, or only nouns. --Fractaler (talk) 07:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
How never (Q40984492) can be part or member of anything?
Whole point of this word to be opposite of this d1g (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What is "never": 1) at no time; on no occasion; in no circumstance; 2) not at any other time; not on any other occasion; not previously; 3) negative particle? --Fractaler (talk) 10:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]