Talk:Q424271/Archive
Autodescription — Q424271/ARCHIVE
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Q424271/ARCHIVE” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- The ID "Q424271/Archive" is unknown to the system. Please use a valid entity ID.
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
Q424271/ARCHIVE
⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
=== Union and disjoint queries===The ID "Q424271/Archive" is unknown to the system. Please use a valid entity ID.The ID "Q424271/Archive" is unknown to the system. Please use a valid entity ID.
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
|
P910
Topic's main category = Q10201902 (no label) made no sense for me, it also didn't match the P910 Documentation examples, I've removed the claim, see Q10201902 on the P910 talk page. Unrelated, why could I fix the port 25 example on Property:P1641, properties should not allow write access without login. –89.15.236.224 06:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- I think it's obviously related and makes sense. --Infovarius (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Infovarius: cawiki "17:40, 12 oct 2017 Paucabot (discussió | contribucions) ha esborrat la pàgina Categoria:Freeciv" looks like a red link for me, but admittedly four days later. –89.15.236.124 12:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Finally got it, sorry: P910 is the inverse of P301, and Q10201902 is a special case using Q424271 as P301. As long as Q10201902 exists it needs a P910 here, maybe some bot will remove the "import from cawiki" later.
I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Infovarius got I right, I completely misunderstood what Q10201902 actually is. –89.15.236.124 15:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC) |