Talk:Q45182324
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — retracted paper (Q45182324)
description: academic journal article which has been retracted
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “retracted paper” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- retracted paper (Q45182324)
- academic journal article (Q18918145)
- scholarly article (Q13442814)
- scientific publication (Q591041)
- scholarly work (Q55915575) (‡)→
- article (Q191067)
- →(†) scientific literature (Q12042160)
- →(‡) scholarly work (Q55915575)
- scholarly article (Q13442814)
- academic journal article (Q18918145)
- retracted paper (Q45182324)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
retracted paper⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Ranking within P31 statement[edit]
Should one rank the "retracted paper" claim preferred rather than the "scholarly article"? Thanks. Trilotat (talk) 18:40, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
- Good question! Given that retracted paper (Q45182324) is a subclass of scholarly article (Q13442814), I think that should not disturb anyone in SPARQL queries, except if they are not including a
/P279*path, which might actually be quite common given that people probably want to shave off query time on these sort of queries. − Pintoch (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Or should retracted articles NOT also be scholarly articles?[edit]
Should these instances be mutually exclusive? Trilotat (talk) 16:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)