Talk:Q4646

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

@Infovarius: please check pages before you move them to a non-disambiguation name item. i moved back the ones clearly marked with {{disambig}} or similar. i left ru and uk at Schnitzler (Q17142442) for you to decide. Maybe you can adapt the ruwiki and ukwiki pages in 1 of the 2 directions? (make it into a real article or into a clear disambiguation) Holger1959 (talk) 23:38, 4 May 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

@Holger1959:, the problem (for you? for Jura? not for me though) is that these pages marked as "family name disambigs". So, formally, they are disambigs, but in fact they contain information only about family name and persons. --Infovarius (talk) 10:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Infovarius: i know, and the situation is even more complex on enwiki, where they have at least 4 classification models for such pages (pure disambiguation, disambig with surname holders list, set index article, or pure surname article; and the content of all off them could actually look the same, it only depends on the last user who changes one of the marker templates). Therefore i try ignoring ruwiki or enwiki links and often leave them in place so that other users can sort them better if wanted. But pages like it:Schnitzler and nl:Schnitzler (also notice the "Schnitzler syndrome" link, not a person!) are clearly disambiguations, not at all family articles. This is why i moved those ones back and ask you to not move them again (as if they where articles). Holger1959 (talk) 23:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]