Talk:Q50090322

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

title of reference

[edit]

@Jean-Frédéric: why did you change the title of the Newsweek source? When I visit the link, I see the “NRA Boycott:” version of the title (though that’s not the same as the title stated in the English Wikipedia article). Do you see something different on that link? Did they change it? —Galaktos (talk) 19:40, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Galaktos: Actually, I just used the `autofill` gadget which pulled the metadata automatically − had not checked the result. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Checking the source of the page, the metadata HTML elements (like og:title) do use the title as pulled by the gadget. Jean-Fred (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jean-Frédéric: hm, but the <title> element also has the “NRA Boycott:” version… not sure why they use different titles :/
But since we have multiple statements with the same reference, and the gadget only adjusted one of them, I figure we should pick one of them and use it consistently. Do you agree? —Galaktos (talk) 20:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, go ahead :) (Actually, I had not copied/pasted the reference to whole items as it seemed to me the article itself might warrant its own Wikidata item. ) Jean-Fred (talk) 10:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done – updated manually, since I couldn’t figure out a quick way to do it automatically and it wasn’t too much work. @Jean-Frédéric: where is that autofill gadget you mentioned? I couldn’t find it. —Galaktos (talk) 13:05, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cool, thanks for tackling this :)
Had forgotten: that script is not a gadget (yet?) but a userscript − User:Aude/citoid.js.
Jean-Fred (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

more companies

[edit]

@Galaktos: A few additional companies have flipped (see English Wikipedia article), can you add them when you get a chance? --DarTar (talk) 15:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DarTar: ✓ Done, thanks for the ping! I tried to model some of the corporate relationships with has part(s) (P527) and object named as (P1932), not sure if that makes sense… —Galaktos (talk) 23:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]