Talk:Q62246
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Autodescription — polycarbonate (Q62246)
description: family of polymers
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “polycarbonate” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- polycarbonate (Q62246)
- polymer (Q81163) (@)→
- organic polymer (Q99600509)
- carbonate ester (Q414835)
- polyester (Q188245)
- →(@) polymer (Q81163)
- →(†) ester (Q101487)
- organooxygen compound (Q71574018)
- oxoacid derivative (Q113547463)
- thermoplastic (Q380677)
- polycarbonate (Q62246)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
polycarbonate
⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}
.
Cleanup: needs to be split
[edit]This item is for the entire class of polycarbonates, but a lot of the statements (e.g. cost, various numerical material properties) appear to be about a specific compound, presumably the most common type, poly(BPA carbonate). I created an item for the latter: poly(bisphenol A carbonate) (Q110254858), and these statements should be moved there. 73.223.72.104 18:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Most (if not all) items about topics like this one are messed up. Usually there is no distinction between macromolecule vs polymer (mixture of macromolecules) vs plastic vs classes/groups of macromolecules/polymers/plastics etc — everything is mixed into one item, just like in Wikipedia everything is described in one article. If you know how it should be done, just do it. I don't think there was any discussion about how polymers should be modelled in Wikidata (i.e. do we need distinct items about macromolecules, polymers and plasics, and how to model relations between such items). Wostr (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2021 (UTC)