Hi! Maybe 987904275 would be a better fit than 989795848 in Norwegian organisation number?
Topic on User talk:Bergenga
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Both! 987904275 before 2009 and 989795848 after 2009. Otherwise the article on nowiki should be split into one part before the Aker Exploration merger and one after.
To put it simple: At a given point in time, orgnr. are unique and a company has only one. But over time a company can have many orgnr. and several companies can have had the same orgnr.. Which means that we simply can't look blindly on the "single value" and "unique value" constraints here on WD.