User talk:EconAmbiente

Welcome to Wikidata, EconAmbiente!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Neo-Jay (talk) 19:01, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Translations of "casa"

Please avoid adding all translations of casa (L350) to that lexeme. There is no need for each meaning to have some sort of "lexicographical center"; it is enough for there to be a path of "translation" or "synonym" properties between two lexemes for the connection between them to be known. Consider, for example, how these lexemes for "mother" or these lexemes for "water" are not "centered" on one lexeme, and yet if one wanted to find equivalents across languages for those two words it would still be possible. Mahir256 (talk) 17:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

After some reorganization, these lexemes for "house" no longer have a "lexicographical center". Mahir256 (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I didn't know. Sorry for the misunderstanding. So it is sufficient that is linked to the lexeme in one language that is linked to the others? EconAmbiente (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Yes, that's sufficient. Notice how there is some logic to the connections, whether based in genealogical relatedness between lexemes and languages or just somewhat geographical in nature. Mahir256 (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Natural History Museum - Museo di Storia Naturale - Museo de Ciencias Naturales

Ciao Ecoambiente, grazie per le tue edizioni ma ho ripristinato una dei loro in 'museo di storia naturale' Q16735822 perché un museo di 'Storia Naturale' (ora tradotto come 'Scienze Naturali') è un museo scientifico e non un museo di storia come contemplato nel senso della disciplina 'Storia' (vedi ad esempio: Outline of History). C'è una certa confusione tra le diverse scuole di pensiero e questo è un problema ricorrente, è facile confondere 'Museo di Storia della Storia Naturale' con 'Museo di Storia Naturale', il primo caso riguarderebbe la storia delle Scienze Naturali e il secondo caso riguarda la diversità della natura; il primo si concentra sul raccontare come i progressi scientifici siano avvenuti nel tempo e il secondo nelle discipline Biologia e Geologia, tradizionalmente considerate come Storia Naturale, con una forte componente nella ricerca degli organismi viventi, dei loro habitat e della loro evoluzione.

Hello Ecoambiente, thanks for your editions but I have converted one of them in 'museum of natural history' Q16735822 because a museum of "Natural History" (now considered/translated as "Natural Sciences") is a scientific museum and not a museum of history as contemplated in the meaning of the discipline 'History' (see for example: Outline of History). There is some confusion between different schools of thought and this is a recurring problem, it is easy to confuse 'Museum of History of Natural History' with 'Museum of Natural History', the first case would be about the history of Natural Sciences and the second case is about the diversity of nature; the first focuses on telling how scientific advances have happened over time and the second in the disciplines Biology and Geology, traditionally considered as Natural History, with a strong component in the research of living organisms, their habitats and their evolution.

Regards, --MartinGala (talk) 17:52, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

No problem, I followed the categorization of en.wiki but I guess also that has issues. EconAmbiente (talk) 09:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)