User talk:Gloumouth1/Archive 1

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Welcome to Wikidata, Gloumouth1!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familarise yourself with:

Wikidata:About – About the project.
Wikidata:Introduction – Another introduction to the project.
Help:Contents – The main help portal for editing and using the site.
Wikidata:Project chat – Discussions about the project.
Wikidata:Tools – A collection of user-developed JS tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards, --Regards, — Moe Epsilon 09:58, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Hello Gloumouth, thanks for the translation of Property:P126 (and P127)! I wasn't sure about the French term. Cheers --Kolja21 (talk) 14:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 14:17, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf von Bennigsen[edit]

Why did you revert Family/Familie??--Kresspahl (talk) 12:39, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because Property:P71 should be used for "taxonomic rank in the classification of organisms". You did the same mistake for other elements (such as Q764940). Could you fix it? Best regards. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 12:46, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any property to connect with family articles in the way, I meant?--Kresspahl (talk) 12:52, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, but have a look to Wikidata:List of properties#Intrapersonal. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

THX--Kresspahl (talk) 13:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bot[edit]

Bonsoir Snipre,
Juste pour m'assurer que j'ai bien compris :

pour faire tourner les petits exemples mentionné sur la page Wikidata:Creating a bot, il faut déjà avoir un compte avec un bot flag ?
pour avoir un compte avec un bot flag, il faut créer un compte classique, et expliquer ici son "projet" de bot pour le compte en question, sans que son code soit nécessairement déjà écrit ?

--Gloumouth1 (talk) 21:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Pas besoin de compte avec flag pour faire des tests: tu peux faire des essais avec ton compte, faut juste faire gaffe de ne pas utiliser en parallèle ton compte pour contribuer manuellement, car en utilisant un navigateur, tu vas créer une deuxième session que les serveurs vont détecter.

Oui, mais encore une fois, si tu comptes faire des modifications ponctuelles (moins de 500 par jour) et que tu fais attention de ne pas faire de modifications toutes les secondes, alors le statut de bot n'est pas utile. Si tu veux que les autres te donnent leur feu vert, mieux vaut mettre à disposition le code. A+ Snipre (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok merci. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"est une partie de"[edit]

Bonjour, je me demande juste, il ne vaudrait pas mieux mettre "fait partie de" qu'"est une partie de" dans P361. Je ne suis pas sûr qu'il y ait une différence de sens, mais il me semble juste qu'il semble plus naturel de dire que la galerie d'Apollon fait partie du Louvre plutôt que de dire qu'elle en "est une partie". --Zolo (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

D'un autre côté, pour l'exemple donné (quark, hadron), ça parait plus logique de mettre "est une partie". Donc en fait, pourquoi pas juste comme en anglais : "partie de" ? --Zolo (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

<proton>fait partie de<atome>, ça sonne aussi bien que <proton>partie de<atome>, donc l'une ou l'autre de tes suggestions me semblent plutôt bienvenues.

Autre sujet, j'ai vu qu'il y a une tentative de clarification des propriétés pierres angulaires de l'ontologie de wikidata en devenir ici. C'est essentiel de faire ça, et de communiquer à ce sujet. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 16:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, j'ai vu ça. On peut peut-être attendre d'être sûr que ce soit stabilisé, et après il faudrait sans doute le traduire :).

Donc, je vais mettre "fait partie de" pour l'instant, on pourra toujours changer ensuite. --Zolo (talk) 18:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

D'accord avec vous. D'ailleurs j'ai ajouté un commentaire ici. Votre avis serait le bienvenu,je pense. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 08:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai laissé un commentaire là bas. Désolé pour le léger formalisme, mais pour des problèmes structurels comme ça, il me semble que c'est indispensable. --Zolo (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Majuscule dans les libellés[edit]

Bonjour Gloumouth1, j'ai vu que tu avais remplacé la majuscule de « Station » par une minucusle (« station »). J'avais cru comprendre qu'il fallait mettre des majuscules ; je veux dire par là que c'est actuellement la très grand majorité des items sur Wikidata et j'utilise systématiquement une majuscule lorsque je renseigne ce champ. Est ce qu'il y a une décision, une règle qui spécifie d'utiliser une minuscule ? Pamputt (talk) 08:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir. Voici 2 pages qui vous seront utiles :

Salutations,

--Gloumouth1 (talk) 21:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

station hertzienne de Pierre-sur-Haute[edit]

Je vous remercie pour vos indications. Je saurais maintenant. Reychstan (talk) 14:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Wikidata's primary sorting property[edit]

You recently participated in a deletion discussion for P107 - main type (GND). The discussion has been closed, as it is clear that a resolution won't come from PfD, and an RfC has been opened on the matter at Wikidata:Requests for comment/Primary sorting property. You are invited to participate there. Please note that this is a mass delivered message, and that I will not see any replies you leave on this page.

Yours, Sven Manguard Wha? 18:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:spectral type[edit]

Hi, Gloumouth1. There was two spectral type values in Proxima Centauri (Q14266) (see this version): one with a source (SIMBAD), one without source. I removed the value without source. --Paperoastro (talk) 21:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thanks for your answer. --Gloumouth1 (talk) 16:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]