User talk:Multichill/Archives/2020/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Is there a way to configure your BotMultichillT so that it doesn't accidentally add creators (solely on the basis on short description) to paintings made after their death, as happened here? ミラP 15:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Miraclepine: that's quite hard. I recall having a look at it before. The cases do show up at Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Creator inception mismatch. Multichill (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Continue?
Dear Multichill, I still don't know, whether You agree that I continue with editing the collections or whether You demand wider discussion. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 08:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Replied at User talk:Daniel Baránek. Multichill (talk) 16:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
RE:Penitent Magdalene
Goodnight. Sorry, some agreed changes were made in the cafe and I didn't check the wikidata. Thanks for correcting it. Greetings. Toxwiki96 (talk) 01:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Moved back to User talk:Toxwiki96. Please keep conversations in one place. Multichill (talk) 16:30, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Saint Louis
Hello there! I'm coming back to you after your remarks regarding the Saint Louis Art Museum (Q1760539). Honestly, my friend, the related property is dead. The website was changed a long time ago now. And its pages have not been archived anywhere using the old numerical IDs. So the latter have become virtually useless. There is no way we can check them. If a mistake was made importing them, we cannot correct anything anymore, as nothing will tell us what the content was. It could have been Turkish music or underage content, as far as Wikidata is concerned. So I want to use my right to proceed elsewhere instead of importing them back. I don't want to be responsible for importing and fossilizing here content that is void, obsolete, not reliable, cannot be sourced and won't ever be. In other situations involving IDs with established historical interest, I will fight hard to maintain the content available. But not in this particular case, honestly. In the hope that you this will find you well, Thierry Caro (talk) 22:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- I forgot to say that the museum could actually have a property for artworks themselves. I will work on that at some point, I guess. This will be interesting. Thierry Caro (talk) 22:35, 29 November 2020 (UTC)