User talk:Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker

LTA

Calm down. Having messages like this displayed for ten minutes more is much easier than the revdel work required from the admins if you keep reverting. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring with the LTA for reasons stated above. --Minorax (talk) 08:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your unresponsiveness regarding my inquiries is noted. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Why should I respond to you, 1234qwer1234qwer4? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 09:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

You neither acted upon my requests nor explained why you wouldn't/why my requests are inappropriate. I regard such behaviour as incivil. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 09:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

What's wrong if I'm going further with reverting vandalism, even it would be in violation of the 3RR? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 09:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

I recommend you reread my original comments. Apart from the revdel argument, such actions are in contradiction to denying recognition; for example, by polluting page histories with such reverts, abusers obly achieve more "fame", which is their goal. See also the explanation at w:WP:BRI (in this situation, especially the paragraph about BRI/IBRL: "A variation of this method ..."). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

So, I have to revert after a vandal being blocked by an administrator, as described at w:wp:BRI? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 10:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

If you see that the vandal does not look like they'll stop reverting back and forth any time soon, this is the better option most of the time. If they just vandalised a couple pages and left, just reverting is of course aproppriate. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 11:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ What will happen if I again engaging an edit war with a vandal or long-term abuser? Nieuwsgierige Gebruiker (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2021 (UTC)