User talk:Pfadintegral

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Logo of Wikidata Welcome to Wikidata, Pfadintegral!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Pamputt (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eistributed-game spurious edit

[edit]

Something is funny with this distributed-game/Widar edit: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q20984691&diff=317813089&oldid=293248451 The name (mine) was already in the list. Do you think it was your error or was it the tool that presented the wrong information? — Finn Årup Nielsen (fnielsen) (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out. Looking at the item prior to my edit, there is no "short author name" property at all. Since the purpose of the tool is to replace short author names with authors, I do not believe it should have presented me the item in the first place. Should I use it again I will take care to check for this kind of thing. Pfadintegral (talk)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Pfadintegral,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Pfadintegral,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eos (Q81814711) and Eos (Q90563444)

[edit]

Hi,

You recently created the two items, what is the difference? — eru [Talk] [french wiki] 14:53, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for alerting me, I made a mistake and have now merged the two items. --Pfadintegral (talk) 12:28, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interview Invitation

[edit]

Hi Pfadintegral,

I noticed your editing stats in Wikidata, which led me to look up your profile. Thank you for all the great work!

I’m reaching out to you because I’m working on a research project about understanding what motivates editors like you to contribute to Wikidata. We’re also interested in learning about how you feel your contributions are being used outside of Wikidata. Since you are such an active community member, I thought you might also be interested in helping to build the broader community’s knowledge about Wikidata, and why it matters.

If you’re interested, let’s schedule a time to talk over Zoom, or whichever platform you prefer. If you are interested, please fill in a questionnaire. The conversation should take about 30 min.

Hope you have a great day,

Chuankaz (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We sent you an e-mail

[edit]

Hello Pfadintegral,

Really sorry for the inconvenience. This is a gentle note to request that you check your email. We sent you a message titled "The Community Insights survey is coming!". If you have questions, email surveys@wikimedia.org.

You can see my explanation here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strassen Berlin

[edit]

Danke für die vielen neuen Strassen. In Mitte füge ich gerade die Strassennummer hinzu.

77.11.86.196 07:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Pfadintegral, siehe auch

Zur Info @Z thomas: Zur Info. --M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

am Beispiel von Wilmersdorf, Westend und Schmargendorf: de:Benutzer:Z thomas/DE-BE-Straßen-Charlottenburg-Wilmersdorf --M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Z thomas, M2k~dewiki: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Project_chat&oldid=1558060337#Hoax_Fasanenstra%C3%9Fe_-_street_in_Wilmersdorf - several creations of a "part of street" as a "street". The definitions of street may vary, but Statistik BB doesn't seem to regard a street located in two Ortsteile to be two streets. 77.13.233.80 20:59, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you always add a German label if not yet present, after you added a Berlin Street ID?

77.11.70.50 15:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Usually I do, in this case I think I just edited the wrong language field by mistake. Pfadintegral (talk) 17:47, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Call for participation in a task-based online experiment

[edit]

Dear Pfadintegral,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender system that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our system based on your previous edits.

Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study will start in late January 2022 or early February 2022, and it should take no more than 30 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link

I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa

In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoudsaa (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Tide deletions

[edit]

Hi, I don't understand why you removed the publisher and ISBN-13 from Winter Tide here. Surely those properties are valid and necessary. Thanks. —Bruce1eetalk 06:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because these properties were already present at Winter Tide (Q106075993), the item for that edition. Winter Tide (Q85625069) is the item for the work and as such should not have information like publisher, ISBN, cover artist etc. which might be different for every edition. Wikidata:WikiProject Books describes the way this works in more detail. Pfadintegral (talk) 06:58, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, now I understand how it works. Each edition of the book has its own Wikidata entry. I'm going to have to revisit some of the other book items I created / edited. —Bruce1eetalk 07:55, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think having the information at the work item is still better than not having it at all and you will find a lot of items where these properties are used with the work items, largely due to automated imports from Wikipedia. But in the long run, this leads to situations like Rendezvous with Rama (Q741222), which gives two publishers and two ISBNs which belong to three different edition, with no way of telling how they correspond to each other. Pfadintegral (talk) 08:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So if the work item has no edition items, then any edition information in the work item should remain there. —Bruce1eetalk 09:28, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, ideally, you'd create an edition item in these cases. And items like Rendezvous with Rama (Q741222) definitely need cleanup. I just wouldn't worry too much about doing this for every item you have created in the past, since there are already thousands of items with that issue. Pfadintegral (talk) 10:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. —Bruce1eetalk 10:05, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trennung von Werk und Ausgabe

[edit]

Bitte beachten, dass Werk und Ausgabe nach unserer abgespeckten FRBR-Implementierung getrennt sein müssen und insbesondere nicht gemergt werden dürfen (aktuelles Beispiel: Q99572046 und Q99572078) --Emu (talk) 16:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anderes Beispiel: Q3414078 vs. Q21181449. Könntest du deine bisherigen Edits mit Hinblick auf Wikidata:WikiProject Books#Bibliographic_properties vielleicht nochmals prüfen? --Emu (talk) 16:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Im ersten genannten Beispiel habe ich die Situation vorgefunden, dass es ein Werkitem gab (Q99572046), ein Ausgabenitem (Q99572078)) und ein Item mit unklarem Status (Q116026868 - Instanz von "Buch"). Ich habe letzteres mit dem Ausgaben-, nicht dem Werkitem gemerget, weil es ausschließlich in einer Referenz verwendet wurde und dort meinem Verständnis nach Ausgaben, nicht Werke hingehören. Im zweiten Fall habe ich zwei Items gemerget, die meinem Verständnis nach beide ein Werk beschrieben haben, und dann zwei Items für Ausgaben heraussepariert. Der jetzt wieder hergestellte Ausgangszustand war und ist unbefriedigend - What is the name of this book? (Q3414078) ist angeblich ein Item über eine Ausgabe, aber enthält Daten, die teilweise zum Werk, teilweise zu zwei verschiedenen Ausgaben gehören. Ich kann die Kritik also nicht nachvollziehen und würde vorschlagen, meine Edits wiederherzustellen. Pfadintegral (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in the WQT UI requirements elicitation online workshop

[edit]

Dear Pfadintegral,

I hope you are doing well,

We are a group of researchers from King’s College London working on developing WQT (Wikidata Quality Toolkit), which will support a diverse set of editors in curating and validating Wikidata content.

We are inviting you to participate in an online workshop aimed at understanding the requirements for designing effective and easy-to-use user interfaces (UI) for three tools within WQT that can support the daily activities of Wikidata editors: recommending items to edit based on their personal preferences, finding items that need better references, and generating entity schemas automatically for better item quality.

The main activity during this workshop will be UI mockup sketching. To facilitate this, we encourage you to attend the workshop using a tablet or laptop with PowerPoint installed or any other drawing tools you prefer. This will allow for a more interactive and productive session as we delve into the UI mockup sketching activities.

Participation is completely voluntary. You should only take part if you want to and choosing not to take part will not disadvantage you in any way. However, your cooperation will be valuable for the WQT design. Please note that all data and responses collected during the workshop will be used solely for the purpose of improving the WQT and understanding editor requirements. We will analyze the results in an anonymized form, ensuring your privacy is protected. Personal information will be kept confidential and will be deleted once it has served its purpose in this research.

The online workshop, which will be held on April 5th, should take no more than 3 hours.

If you agree to participate in this workshop, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form to register your interest https://forms.office.com/e/9mrE8rXZVg Then, I will contact you with all the instructions for the workshop.

For more information about my project, please read this page: https://king-s-knowledge-graph-lab.github.io/WikidataQualityToolkit/

If you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me at the email address mentioned above.

Thank you for considering taking part in this project.

Regards Kholoudsaa (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pfadintegral&oldid=2104418740"