User talk:Pratap Pandit

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User: დამოკიდებულება has been using the following accounts without informing the other contributors: Nwalker3 - Jedi3 - Luke Jedi Skywalker - ΞΔΞ. --27.122.14.73 16:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. May be. I dont know if they are same users. And there is no way I can tell. Skywalker is a popular username though. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 19:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. All these accounts have similar edit pattern on the same pages. See the following links here: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. --Sunfee (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, this makes it more clearer. They are probably the same user. But those are old accounts and not being used. Does that violate any policy ? --Pratap Pandit (talk) 00:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sunfee, do you have behavioral evidence linking these accounts. It will be useful to list some of them for the admins to take a look on these accounts. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 13:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response, here are more evidences linking these accounts: They all use the same authors and sources on similar topics:

  • Koenraad Elst, Decolonizing the Hindu mind - [10] [11] [12] [13]
  • Kishori Saran Lal, The Muslim Slave System in Medieval India - [14] [15] [16].
  • Sita Ram Goel, The Calcutta Quran Petition - [17] [18] [19]
  • Robert Spencer, The history of Jihad: From Muhammad to ISIS - [20] [21] [22]

Sunfee (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bharatvani.org - [23] [24] [25] [26]
Ths case of anti-muslim political propaganda on wikiquote was raised here (account: ΞΔΞ is mentionned): [27]. Sunfee (talk) 17:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the links, Sunfee. The CU said the accounts are stale and the local admins seems to be unbothered by that blatant disruption that this user is engaging in. The project seems to be very badly managed. I have already said all there was to say, but looks like this is allowed there. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 18:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]