Wikidata:Property proposal/ClassInd rating
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ClassInd rating[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
| Description | rating of an audiovisual work, video game or RPG in the Brazilian Advisory Rating System (ClassInd) |
|---|---|
| Represents | Brazilian Advisory Rating System (Q26323090) |
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | film (Q11424), television program (Q15416), video game (Q7889), role-playing game (Q160738) |
| Allowed values | L (Q26678731), 10 (Q26678732), 12 (Q26678733), 14 (Q26678734), 16 (Q26678735), and 18 (Q26678736) |
| Example | Central Station (Q1054036) → 12 (Q26678733) |
| Source | http://portal.mj.gov.br/ClassificacaoIndicativa/jsps/ConsultarObraForm.jsp |
- Motivation
See existing rating properties. Máté (talk) 20:59, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:35, 24 August 2016 (UTC)- Do we really need one property for every country? ChristianKl (talk) 22:48, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: It is not a by country division we have now. Some systems are used in several countries, some countries have several systems. The reason I would see to keep them in separate properties is that when a work is rated more than one times in the same system, it is easy enough now to indicate the most recent one by setting its rank preferred. If we store all content rating in one property not only would we need a large set of very complex constraints for it, the ranks would likely to become a mess quite quickly. Also, Wikipedia infoboxes are likely to include only one or two of these systems (the ones relevant in territories where the language is spoken)—of course Lua can sort this out if you have programmers to code it which you quite often don't. List of content rating properties: [1]. – Máté (talk) 05:43, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
