Wikidata:Property proposal/JORF appointments ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JORFsearch person ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Description | identifier of an official on JORF appointments' database |
---|---|
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | civil service (Q11771944) |
Allowed values | [\w\- ]+ |
Example | |
Source | https://jorfsearch.steinertriples.fr/ |
Formatter URL | https://jorfsearch.steinertriples.fr/name/$1 |
It would improve our coverage of civil servants—and officials in particular. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC).
- Started again today. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Discussion
Notified participants of WikiProject France. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC).
- Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support David (talk) 07:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Oppose- given the name of the property I would expect this id to be minted by an official body, but this platform is run by an individual (I would love to see this platform being adopted by people like Etalab though). The fact that the platform is run by a third-party would not be an issue if the identifiers it used were curated by the official body, but it looks like in this case the identifiers are specific to the third-party platform. − Pintoch (talk) 10:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)- Salut Pintoch. C'est vrai que ça serait beaucoup mieux si ce site se voyait conférer un statut officiel. Cependant, qu'il ne l'ait pas change quoi, fondamentalement ? Cela reste AMHA une propriété fort utile, en particulier pour avoir un aperçu rapide de la carrière d'un haut fonctionnaire (même si les données sont lacunaires). Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC).
- Okay, mais le nom devrait être changé en quelque-chose qui rend clair le fait que c'est un service indépendant de l'administration française. Par exemple "jorfsearch person ID", "JORF steinertriples.fr ID" ou quelque-chose du genre. − Pintoch (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- D'accord Pintoch, c'est fait. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC).
- Génial merci! Support donc. − Pintoch (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- C'est bien naturel de tenir compte des remarques des uns et des autres :). Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC).
- Génial merci! Support donc. − Pintoch (talk) 16:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- D'accord Pintoch, c'est fait. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC).
- Okay, mais le nom devrait être changé en quelque-chose qui rend clair le fait que c'est un service indépendant de l'administration française. Par exemple "jorfsearch person ID", "JORF steinertriples.fr ID" ou quelque-chose du genre. − Pintoch (talk) 10:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- Salut Pintoch. C'est vrai que ça serait beaucoup mieux si ce site se voyait conférer un statut officiel. Cependant, qu'il ne l'ait pas change quoi, fondamentalement ? Cela reste AMHA une propriété fort utile, en particulier pour avoir un aperçu rapide de la carrière d'un haut fonctionnaire (même si les données sont lacunaires). Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC).
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Thierry Caro, Nomen ad hoc, Pintoch: Done: P4828 (P4828). − Pintoch (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
- Merci ! Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:49, 11 February 2018 (UTC).