Wikidata:Property proposal/introduced in version (2)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
introduced in version, removed in version[edit]
introduced in version[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
| Description | Inverse of introduced feature (P751). |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | feature |
| Allowed values | software |
| Example 1 | Windows Desktop Gadgets (Q828312) → Windows Vista (Q11230) |
| Example 2 | APIQueryInfoTokens (Q21675049) → MediaWiki 1.13 (Q21722631) |
| Example 3 | canvas (Q657954) → HTML5 (Q2053) |
| Example 4 | 🔗 (Q55522849) → Unicode 6.0 (Q87724285) |
| See also | deprecated in version (P2379) |
removed in version[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Not done
| Description | Inverse of removed feature (P756). |
|---|---|
| Data type | Item |
| Domain | feature |
| Allowed values | software |
| Example 1 | APIEditBeforeSave (Q21675045) → MediaWiki 1.34 (Q89096161) |
| Example 2 | MISSING |
| Example 3 | MISSING |
| See also | deprecated in version (P2379) |
Discussion[edit]
A software version can introduce a large number of new feature that can not be added to the version item.
Previous proposal: Wikidata:Property proposal/introduced in version
--GZWDer (talk) 07:57, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Support- Support Jc86035 (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Comment I would like to see these properties replace introduced feature (P751) and removed feature (P756), but I'm not sure if I support having an item for every software version and feature. --Haansn08 (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)- If this is a clear superset of introduced feature (P751) and removed feature (P756) it would make more sense to increase the scope of those and maybe rename them. Is there are argument that we want this property to be distinct from those two? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 10:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, I hadn't realized these proposals were inverses of existing properties; I think we need a better argument for creating them; I've struck my support vote. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Per ChristianKl and ArthurPSmith. Husky (talk) 22:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)- Comment If there is an item for the feature and the version, it seems to make sense to add it this way round. --- Jura 11:40, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 22:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Not done Clearly lacking consensus. JesseW (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2021 (UTC)