Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Case/Eiskrahablo
- Eiskrahablo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- Tools: interaction-timeline · intersect-contribs
11 December 2022
[edit]- Hao Khao (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate)
- USSF144 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) (already blocked)
- Sarawon (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) (already blocked)
- Ozokha (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · case block · block log · CA · checkuser (log) · investigate) (already blocked)
Rationale, discussion and results
[edit]Reason: All of these have been pushing the same edits at Q5250962 (see the item's history, which is full of their contributions). The master is a known LTA from id.wikipedia. I've also listed the previous socks for the sake of completeness. --Paul 012 (talk) 19:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Note: The case has been confirmed on Commons, and I've reported the user at AN for speedier processing. I'll leave the case open as it might be useful to also check for sleepers here. --Paul 012 (talk) 00:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Results: All the older accounts are 
Stale, but based on what I can see in the log (cc @علاء: who did the earlier checks) I can say it's 
Possible. Behavioral evidence will have to be used here. 
No comment on the IP addresses.--Jasper Deng (talk) 11:34, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. User already blocked per Commons CU evidence. --Paul 012 (talk) 08:54, 16 December 2022 (UTC)