Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/04/21
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
On the Compressibility of Affinely Singular Random Vectors (Q102788545): scientific article published in 2020: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? --Billy Jaz (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Not deleted appears to be notable, published in a reputable source and has been cited by other papers --DannyS712 (talk) 23:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
City Plumbing (Q105089893): Plumbing supply chain in the United Kingdom, owned by Travis Perkins: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable spam with no sitelinks. --IWI (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2021 (UTC)- Not spam - subsidiary of well known company, more than 350 branches according to https://www.ukhaulier.co.uk/news/road-transport/fleet/award-winning-city-plumbing-taps-into-bevan-group-build-quality-for-new-luton-van-fleet/ - item probably created for OSM Name Suggestion Index ID (P8253). Peter James (talk) 20:20, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted per above, item has OSM Name Suggestion Index ID (P8253) which suggests notability (Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316)) --DannyS712 (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q105247454: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
For two unnecessary images at Commons a WD item has been opened for an unnotable military chaplain. I also want to open an item for our "mahalle" imam and can make him a cat and gallery in Commons but he is not notable. Just like this chap. I know we give importance to having a Commons cat. (I defended it several times; but supposing that people open Commons cats for people who have some notability.) BTW this WD item is opened because I asked the deletion of the nonsense Commons cat. Whatever. E4024 (talk) 01:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Keep for now, wait to see if the Commons category is deleted or not. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)- More pictures found. I made a better cat for him although I still think he is not notable and out of scope. Commons makes cats for people (who are sometimes out of scope) only with the aim of bringing together their files; sometimes even for the purpose of deleting them altogether. I myself have done this, for some Servet (forgot surname) guy from Turkey and an Indonesian teenager who thought she was an actress. As both the files and their cats were deleted I cannot link them now. --E4024 (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, having a sitelink to a category on commons isn't enough per Wikidata:Notability --DannyS712 (talk) 23:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q55830146: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-insert (see edit history), non-notable. --Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- The Corsican article and the WM Commons category have to be deleted first. --Wolverène (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Bantey (Q96994506): Nigerian musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notability Quakewoody (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Meets Wikidata notability criteria. The item for a real, existing person/entity who is a musician with standard identifiers from standard music platforms. The item "refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity. The entity must be notable, in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references." --Smallison (talk) 18:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Facebook isn't an identifier. Quakewoody (talk) 18:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- This individual is an actual person, a musician, that can be verified with music on several platforms and a small group of articles in the press. This is not someone simply posting a live video on Facebook. I am unsure as to why you, Quakewoody, believe Wikidata notability has not been met. Wikidata does not have the same notability criteria as Wikipedia.--Smallison (talk) 02:13, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- The phonebook argument doesn't work. Quakewoody (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a phonebook argument. This is following Wikidata criteria. --Smallison (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is the phone book argument. Because it takes more than simply being listed in the phonebook to be considered notable even though the phonebook is a serious and publicly available reference. Quakewoody (talk) 18:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a phonebook argument. This is following Wikidata criteria. --Smallison (talk) 18:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete All external identifiers are instances of Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320), so there are currently no external identifiers that undoubtedly imply notability. Same for the two references one of which linking to Yahoo! Finance which states that the article was copied from Accesswire, the other being Accesswire itself which even provides a handy „Tell My Story“-button in the header. --Nw520 (talk) 00:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)- Keep wikidata notability is much different from Wikipedia @Quakewoody. Seems like you have interest of conflict on other subjects as well like queer topics get it together ASAP. Katkwo1993 (talk)
- Keep according to WD:N#2. --Hannes Röst (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted appears to be notable, has news coverage in AccessWire reproduced in Yahoo Finance, a mainstream news outlet. Subject meets Wikidata:Notability #2. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
geographical name (Q10816094): geographical names of the Czech Republic for their geonames database: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Same concept as toponym Q7884789 UWashPrincipalCataloger (talk) 20:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep There are entries on the cswiki for both. should be fixed there first, can be merged afterwards, so no action needed on this page. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 18:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted has a sitelink, if the cswiki article is merged this can be revisited --DannyS712 (talk) 00:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Niklas Fiekas (Q104546567): software developer and chess player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Neither FIDE ID nor Github username justify relevance. Steak (talk) 10:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I somehow got interrupted when creating this item and forgot to create the statement that implies notability. He is one of the two developers of Lichess (Q19831807) and the sole developer of its distributed analysis software. I added the respective statements. This item should now clearly fulfill notability criterion 3. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 11:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per WD:N. --Hannes Röst (talk) 01:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted appears to meet notability rules now --DannyS712 (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
list of stumbling stones in Zschopau (Q105047362): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep temporarily moved while completed, available via url. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) at 14:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC).
- Not deleted now has a sitelink that works --DannyS712 (talk) 00:08, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
list of stumbling stones in Woltersdorf (Q105233876): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No (more) sitelink, no indication of notability --→ «« Man77 »» 23:17, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep the article has been moved until completed, can still link via url – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) at 14:23, 26 February 2021 (UTC).
- Not deleted now has a sitelink that works --DannyS712 (talk) 00:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q56504732: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? Wolverène (talk) 08:04, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, notable, because regardless it refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references. per Wikidata:Notability Criterion 2. -Animalparty (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- 1) None of those identifiers imply notability. 2) With such a liberal interpretation of WD:N we're literally wasting time here, 99% of people-related items have identifiers. 3) Just some student girl from the Eastern Europe who visited Woodman because of a little money, she can't be notable just because she had 'given name+last name' -templated pseudonym. She left no significant trace in the X industry. --Wolverène (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, didn't find any "serious" references - listings of porn videos don't count --DannyS712 (talk) 00:13, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Con Mis Hijos No Te Metas (Q28940945): Peruvian social movement: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not an actual topic - a disruptive entry created by a now indefinitely blocked user Kashmiri (talk) 10:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted meets notability rules, has a sitelink. @Kashmiri: FYI merely being created by a blocked user doesn't mean that the item should necessarily be deleted, its about if the item is notable or not --DannyS712 (talk) 00:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
uber5000 (Q104172875): A Canadian muralist based in Toronto.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not connected to a Wikipedia article Overcast07 (talk) 09:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Fails Wikidata:Notability criteria 1 and 3. There has been some news coverage, but I'm not sure if that's enough for criterion 2. Overcast07 (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I found this [1] who include id birth name. If he produce art. we may keep him for structural need. --Fralambert (talk) 02:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted per news coverage pointed out by Fralambert - appears notable --DannyS712 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Thiakry (Q106574185): West African millet couscous: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This page does not contain any content. In addition to this there is already a page on this subject --Lazone91 (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted @Lazone91: the page had no content because you removed it all to add to the existing item Thiakry (Q16935381) - in the future, please merge (Help:Merge) the items instead, so that the duplicate is a redirect to the existing page, instead of requesting that it be deleted. I've redirected it in this case --DannyS712 (talk) 00:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q11658058: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted elsewhere --DavidMar86hdf (talk) 18:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Wait Have to be deleted on jawiki first. --Fralambert (talk) 13:25, 10 April 2021 (UTC)- Deleted - the jawiki item is tagged as a soft redirect to wiktionary, so I think that qualifies as a redirect and thus not counted towards sitelinks, so the item can be deleted. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hamed Baradaran (Q38212996): persian singer and composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam MADdi0X (talk) 04:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Exists on a few Wikipedias. --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)- Not deleted has a sitelink, deletion request filed by an LTA, no prejudice to re-requesting deletion if the sitelink is deleted --DannyS712 (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Ḥusām al-Dīn Farfūr (Q106319930): Muslim theologian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam MADdi0X (talk) 05:28, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- No spam (sources: LCAuth and GND). Please block User:MADdi0X. --Kolja21 (talk) 05:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Kolja21 By what law do you say they should block me?Please enter the text of the policy under which you requested my blocking here.MADdi0X (talk) 08:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted appears notable at first glance, deletion request filed by an LTA, no need to block since they are already locked --DannyS712 (talk) 00:34, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q105731348: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty. de-article was deleted. --Dandelo (talk) 08:53, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106401070: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test page MADdi0X (talk) 02:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted does not appear to be a test page, deletion request filed by an LTA, no prejudice to re-requesting deletion if a different reason applies --DannyS712 (talk) 00:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106400966: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Test page MADdi0X (talk) 02:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is a test? "Han Chinese culture" certainly seems like something that exists. Elli (talk) 08:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- It doesn't appear to be a test and I believe it is potentially notable since Han Chinese people have obviously some sort of culture, different from cultures of 8% of other Chinese people. --Wolverène (talk) 08:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted does not appear to be a test page, deletion request filed by an LTA, no prejudice to re-requesting deletion if a different reason applies --DannyS712 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q105640961: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No Information at all Bahnmoeller (talk) 08:10, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted reason given does not apply, the item has a bunch of information --DannyS712 (talk) 00:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106487558: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Accidentally created with QuickStatements. --Robin van der Vliet (talk) (contribs) 07:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106563935: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty item. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106571441: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy --Hoo man (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106571139: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy --Hoo man (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106570622: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy --Hoo man (talk) 13:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106567880: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Crosswiki self promotion campaign. No site links. Green Giant (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Amir-Hossein Mahmoudi (Q105399373): engineering professor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Notabil wikitar (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- So suspicious. This is a name that mh6ti likes to troll us with. The IP that created the item is a mh6ti IP (IPv6 should have been range blocked long ago). And the user account that nominated it is only 5 minutes old. But look at all of the identifiers and the data they contain. Quakewoody (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Quakewoody Unless the request to delete has anything to do with creating an account, I am a wiki user and I wanted to report anonymously without identifying myself. Now, where is the problem? I think you are unaware that you are blocked in several languages due to game backup. You yourself are an open Socks like Mh6ti.:)--Notabil wikitar (talk) 22:19, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep valid identifiers for a published author. --RAN (talk) 01:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed, however, because of the troll farm which has created the item as well as nominated it (playing good cop, bad cop), is notorious for creating backstops for their spamming purposes. Therefore, we need to verify those links AND the data they contain. Yes, that means trying to figure out of this guy actually published 50 scientific papers or if it is just more made up non-sense. Quakewoody (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, ORCIDator added now plenty of articles. Matlin (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, Author of publications Mistiks
- This item is conflating engineering scholars Amir-Hossein Mahmoudi in Iran and Amir Hossein Mohammadi in South Africa. I was editing it and may have made it worse before I noticed the problem. Sorry if so! Both seem notable to me, though.—Altercari (talk) 17:06, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- It wasn't as bad as I thought. The English label was incorrectly changed to 'Amir Mohammadi' on 03-21 by 2a01:5ec0:9010:6105:c535:4c4e:ed1f:948b (talk • contribs • logs) (blocked on 03-23). On 03-24, another user, 2a01:5ec0:9013:fec1:5cbd:2f88:b471:b8ab (talk • contribs • logs), made the same change in Dutch and Polish. I added the wrong Scopus id today, but have corrected it. Everything else matches the Iranian scholar.—Altercari (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Mahmoudi has been cited by Q83022436, Q63776756, Q59558453.—Altercari (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted appears notable, per above --DannyS712 (talk) 00:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q105429923: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notability policy #1 Minorax (talk) 05:54, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Can the concept (the MediaWiki component) be considered as the main subject of Help:Recent changes (Q3234746) (and mw:Category:Recent changes), thus fulfilling a structural need? I don't see why we want to collect links to every site's recent changes page, though. (@Jdlrobson, GZWDer: as creator of Q105429923 and MediaWiki special page (Q83378654) respectively.) whym (talk) 12:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- it can be deleted. I was curious if other sites e.g wikipedia would allow switching languages between special pages but the software doesn't seem to support this. Jdlrobson (talk) 15:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- AFAIK Special:RecentChanges works on every wiki but translated versions, such as fr: Spécial:Modifications récentes of French wikis won’t work on others. Minorax (talk) 23:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep #3 structural need for Help:Recent changes (Q3234746). --- Jura 05:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted I agree its probably not notable, but since we have a bunch of other special pages its probably worth a broader discussion. For now, not deleted due to structural benefits --DannyS712 (talk) 00:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
The view that Wikidata:Verifiability describes doesn't reflect current practice and consensus in Wikidata (and the page itself was never made policy). It's existence is doing more to confuse users about the policies of Wikidata then it does to inform them. While it might be valuable to have a policy dealing with the subject it would to be need to be written from scratch. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 11:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed. We also need to make it easier to add sources. It is not intuitive at all for people who haven't read the help page, nor is the help page easily accessible for most. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 03:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this is the right place to discuss deletion of that page, since it isn't an item - I would discuss a rewrite on the talkpage or project chat --DannyS712 (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep xDDDDddd Matlin (talk) 11:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not deleted (for the bot to archive) as I commented 2 months ago, this isn't the right place and needs broader discussion --DannyS712 (talk) 00:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106450065: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:21, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by DannyS712 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q105975462: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability / SEO. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 17:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106069563: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106070608: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106122157: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 17:40, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106519715: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable entrepreneur; no sitelinks/IDs/references Jamie7687 (talk) 11:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106540994: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Q10307104: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable person (curriculum vitae); already deleted on ptwiki. Francisco (talk) 20:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106520225: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Resulted from page move vandalism on enwiki. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106568076: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Accidentally created this item; not enough information and references to add to it to make it credible --Courtkishimoto (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106570222: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Newly created, unused; work being moved turned out to be a redirect only, please kill this as it is unneeded — billinghurst sDrewth 04:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106101787: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106127846: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notability. I did a quick Google search about this item. I couldn’t find any serious, not user-generated information. This item might therefore not meet the Wikidata:Notability criteria. Please note that this doesn’t mean that the person, company or product described by the item isn’t important; it just means that it might not be a suitable item within Wikidata at this moment. -- Emu (talk) 20:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106574763: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Per notability policy Jan Myšák (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106299146: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
French ship Hector (Q17355298): ship of the line of the French Navy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Double of Q5502468 --CptKeyes (talk) 09:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Rachmat04, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Elaine Labourel (Q106114879): Anglican church official: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Only name + sex/gender. It’s impossible to know who this item is about. -- Emu (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- I missed that, sorry. Withdrawn --Emu (talk) 15:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- I missed that, sorry.
Not done --Emu (talk) 15:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q10337754: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable item (ESR-SIW). Francisco (talk) 21:41, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Stanglavine (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106429502: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable subject. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:52, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106012869: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable subject. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 14:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q105713671: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable Baby come (talk) 13:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Stanglavine (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
John Serry Jr. (Q99703261): American jazz pianist and composer (born 1954): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Looks like this was created to add an ID to a person that already existed - Q16186479. I moved the ID so I believe the duplicate can be deleted. Archiverlandson (talk) 17:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Stanglavine, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Q106538986: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted category; spam — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted by Stanglavine (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Works of Stephen Sondheim
Works of Stephen Sondheim (Q106148339): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
This looks to be a duplicate entry for the human Stephen Sondheim Stephen Sondheim (Q153579). Works of his should be added (or are maybe already are present) individually? Archiverlandson (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
- Not done The person and the list of works are two different things. I fixed the item (was wrong, no more "human", but "Wikimedia list article", see sitelink w:en:Works of Stephen Sondheim). stanglavine msg 17:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)