Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/10/03

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

Q108561886

Q108561886: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki promotion, unlinked item, recreation of recently-deleted Q97598326, Q97907047, Q97927024, Q97940636, Q97980958, Q98000095, Q98102699, Q99982114, Q102256016, Q104153312, Q104359167, Q105611531 and Q107014174. Gyrostat (talk) 17:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

If it was deleted so many times before, that must be for a valid reason. --E4024 (talk) 01:08, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Yes, because it doesn't match any of the notability criteria, and is used as cross-wiki spam by its creator. Gyrostat (talk) 11:04, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment On Wikimedia Commons there are with Fabien Coupoux in Vendée Globe 2020.jpg and Vendée Globe 2020 - Alexia Barrier interview.jpg two pictures of him, so he could actually also have a Commons category. It is currently not entirely clear whether such a category makes someone relevant or not. There are opposing opinions here in Wikidata and the relevance criteria of Wikidata are not very clear - at least for me. --Gymnicus (talk) 12:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
About the Commons category, it was created (yes, cross-wiki spam...), and it was deleted. Multiple times (starting to see a trend here). It would be astonishing to consider that as a proof of notability. Gyrostat ( talk) 23:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

You are right there and I have also seen these deletions. Nevertheless, I don't understand it, because it's actually the case that categories are not even deleted where there is only an image. But it doesn't matter, that's not the topic here, I just wanted to have noted. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Linked to another item that is also listed for deletion. Gyrostat (talk) 23:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

All Ital is Not notable, Promotional and advertising Stepen Breker (talk) 01:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Done --Emu (talk) 23:20, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q98600561

Q98600561: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There isn't a Playboy "narrative universe" Trivialist (talk) 23:12, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete per nom, looks absurd. --E4024 (talk) 13:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108657476

Q108657476: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki spam alongside Q108561886, recreation of an item deleted multiple times last summer + Q102285895 and Q107065279. Doesn't match notability criterias. Gyrostat (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Linked to Q108561886, listed above and part of the cross-wiki spam effort by this user for several months now. Gyrostat (talk) 14:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Please give a reason. --2404:200:FF20:0:0:0:0:29C4 16:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Not meeting notability criterias is a sufficient reason. (Just hoping this is not a sockpuppet...) Gyrostat (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

@Gyrostat: The sentence “Please give a reason.” did not refer to you or to the discussion on deletion of the data object Q108657476. The IP probably wanted to suggest a data object for deletion and forgot the reason for deletion, but saved it anyway and so the sentence “Please give a reason.” comes out, which can be skipped. --Gymnicus (talk) 08:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q23907968

Mahmoud Refaat (Q23907968): International relations scholar and lawyer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Likely positive long term abuse to duck test (see: this technical page ; Special:CentralAuth/Behrouz.lawyer) ; french deletion ; german deletion, ...) --LD (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@LD: Here in Wikidata there will be no deletion according to the current status, even if all Wikipedia articles about it are deleted. As the founder and president of the relevant organization European Institute for International Law and International Relations (Q37988192), he has a structural benefit for Wikidata. --Gymnicus (talk) 09:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

@Gymnicus: thank's for answering. European Institute for International Law and International Relations (Q37988192) & Iran Central Bar Association (Q65198048) are also written globally by the same few (potentially paid) people (without diclosure). So yeah, long term abuse. --LD (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done It’s pointless to have this RfD when there are various sitelinks --Emu (talk) 23:06, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108671758

Q108671758: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Xezbeth (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

In her picture I see a couple of notable things (her eyes :) but yes, I agree: Delete. --E4024 (talk) 19:04, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q106657405

Břetislav Friedrich (Q106657405): agent of the Czechoslovak Secret Police: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No information at all Bahnmoeller (talk) 21:00, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Information added. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 21:23, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

He could use some different sources also; I understand the item only depends on the Personnel Department data? (Or is that only source an independent databank? If not, we can use the data of a -say- X Finance Bank to consider the young cashier with eye-glasses (what was her name?) paying checks at the Central Branch as notable...) --E4024 (talk) 01:06, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done The source (w:en:Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes) seems to imply notability. --Emu (talk) 23:01, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108731081

Q108731081: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, no sources Jklamo (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108731016

Q108731016: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, no sources Jklamo (talk) 16:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q96099063

Q96099063: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Another hoax by User:Kriestovo Nysian/User:Sibinia. No such book exists. The manuscript pages shown in commons:Category:Żywopis Sirbskiej Pomorskiej Ziemie are from a totally different book of unrelated content. --Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 22:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Emu (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108541439

Q108541439: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability. Afeef (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108779535

Q108779535: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Article on arwiki deleted, WD:N Toastskat (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by HakanIST (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108178183

Dennis Jose Pesimo Borbon (Q108178183): Filipino blogger: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Dennis and José (not "Jose") are two different names, and not a compound name. E4024 (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Not deleted. Withdrawn. (Opened by mistake.) --E4024 (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108178520

Q108178520: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Dennis and José (not "Jose") are two different names, and not a compound name. E4024 (talk) 22:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Lexeme:L611890

invalid ID (L611890): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a lexeme but a semantic item --Kotofey2016 (talk) 23:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mahir256 (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108769349

Reincarnated as a Sword (Q108769349): Japanese light novel series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The ID of that item already exists, it is Q55530425 --Alejan98 (talk) 00:08, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108772636

Q108772636: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

En-article was deleted. Nothing link here. HarryNº2 (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108479101

Q108479101: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy. Nothing link here. HarryNº2 (talk) 06:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Q107972561

Q107972561: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability and promotional. Afeef (talk) 06:21, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Q108569724

Q108569724: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Relevance not shown Gymnicus (talk) 20:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by BrokenSegue (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Lexeme:L228280

invalid ID (L228280): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I found this while looking through a list of longest lemmas. I think any definition of a lexeme that’s lax enough to include this would have to include so many other lexemes that it would be impractical to work with. The lexeme has no senses and no incoming links. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)