Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2021/12/24

Unable to determine referent. Single linked item has been deleted and I have been unable to find archived or cached versions to determine a suitable merge target. Daask (talk) 21:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

I was able to find https://github.com/nlplab/brat/blob/master/example-data/normalisation/OBO/FMA.txt#L39 and https://ifaa.unifr.ch/Public/EntryPage/TA98%20Tree/Entity%20TA98%20EN/02.0.00.032%20Entity%20TA98%20EN.htm if that helps? - Nikki (talk) 07:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q97949455

Pierre André Leclercq (Q97949455): French photographer and Wikimedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) Most of the data in this item was added by the subject himself or by BOTs. --Martinvl (talk) 14:00, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

It must not be difficult to find out if the photographer is notable or not. French speaking people? --E4024 (talk) 00:07, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Comment He item seem highly used in Commons, expecially by c:Creator:Pierre André Leclercq. This is why that it's semi-protect. --Fralambert (talk) 00:31, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Any sources? --E4024 (talk) 02:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

@E4024, Fralambert: As far as I can tell, a creator page in Wikimedia Commons makes a data object relevant. But you have to note that Pierre André Leclercq created this page for himself, as you can see in the version history of the page. This is why this page is to be seen as a self-portrayal. --2003:DA:170B:EBDC:4C86:F2FA:28E2:5A77 08:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

So what? He is either notable or not notable. Nothing else is relevant. BTW please either log in with your user name (it is clear you know at least pinging better than me) or create a user name. You are writing from my city, pinging me, thus obliging me to respond; and tomorrow when some conflict happens "I" will be accused of sock puppetry while no-one can accuse an anonymous person who is changing IPs all the time. Please consider what I am telling you... --E4024 (talk) 13:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Bah, the above IP seems to travel around the world all the time, and during the Covid pandemia, interesting... E4024 (talk) 02:21, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

@E4024: For real? If I look at the location of my IP addresses via whatismyipaddress, then they are always in the same region and also in almost the correct region. But of course I don't know which program you are using. --2003:DA:170B:EBB5:8951:FD29:162F:1E 10:51, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Something that does not let you make more than 5 checks free of charge a day. Maybe I confused this IP with a similar one from Ankara, Turkey. No idea. Still I urge you (and the other IPs) to open user accounts not to cause confusion... E4024 (talk) 13:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done, item is in use on Commons. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q21012039

Birgit Hochmuth (Q21012039): German puppet builder: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Relevance not shown. Only linked by relatives who do not give it any relevance and the family relationships are also not documented with sources. --2003:DA:1710:9C29:8595:67C1:B31E:477D 14:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Being German seems to be a supporting reason for being considered notable in some places, but I would rather like to see sources. --E4024 (talk) 02:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done Seems to meet notability for structural needs. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q106876944

moreIdentifiers (Q106876944): script to import identifiers from VIAF into Wikidata: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable Gymnicus (talk) 08:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

No need for this request recognizable.
Originally I created the item to shave some bytes from the edit summary of the script User:Bargioni/moreIdentifiers.js:

From 60
"Added with [[User:Bargioni/moreIdentifiers|moreIdentifiers]]"
To 18 
"via [[Q106876944]]"

But unrelated to that intention it is completely fine for a User script to have a Wikidata entry. There is even a dedicated category for it: Wikidata tool. And did you know that the Tool template explicitly includes an item section to link to a Wikidata entry? With 600+ lines of code and customizability, moreidentifiers is a rather complex userscript and without any doubt deserves it's entry, just as autoEdit has for ages. Clearly Keep --Frlgin (talk) 14:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

The same rules apply to data objects from the Wikimedia universe as to all other data objects. You must also meet the Wikidata relevance criteria. From my point of view, the data object doesn't do this. It is clear that the first point of the Wikidata relevance criteria is not met. On the second point one could argue with the described at URL (P973) statement. But there the URL https://www.wikidata.ryancray.com/wiki/Wikidata:Tools/Edit_items#moreIdentifiers is only linked to a Wikidata page, which is why one cannot speak of a reputable source. Thus, the second point of the Wikidata relevance criteria is also not met. Now, based on the contribution of Frlgin one could say that there is a structural benefit. But such a structural benefit is, from my point of view, a complete “bullshit”. "The data object is relevant because the program described in the data object accesses the data object." If such a reason is waved through, then I no longer know how to proceed with Wikidata. --Gymnicus (talk) 14:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

If we delete this item, somebody will probably create Wikidata:Tools/moreIdentifiers. I doubt it would be deleted. Then there’s notability. Not sure if this is really a good use of our sparse time. --Emu (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@Emu: This page can be kept, but only because of this page there will be no new data object, because such a page does not fall under the first point of the Wikidata relevance criteria. --Gymnicus (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@Gymnicus: Why? Which exception to WD:N #1 would apply? --Emu (talk) 21:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Keep otherwise instances of Wikidata tool (Q20726407) will be incomplete. --- Jura 15:47, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@Jura1: What an absurd reason to hold on. This data object is already incomplete. For example, the Wikidata tool Move claims does not have a data object. --Gymnicus (talk) 21:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Quite possible. I haven't finished creating item for all of them. --- Jura 09:36, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Not done per Jura1's comments, seems to meet notability. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108296900

rech (Q108296900): Wikidata patrolling tool: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable Gymnicus (talk) 19:35, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Keep I'm busy cataloguing and modelling Wikidata and Wikimedia tools. Even disregarding WD:N, it should be obvious why this is useful and relevant. --Azertus (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Now all of a sudden the data object Pasleim (Q108296899) is linked to this data object. Wikidata or certain users of Wikidata also present themselves and merchandising their "products" here. --Gymnicus (talk)

There is no merchandising here. As I said, I am documenting these tools. Assume good faith please. --Azertus (talk) 09:08, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

On hold awaiting the outcome of the discussion in WD:PC and WD:N.--So9q (talk) 12:47, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done seems to meet notability requirements. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q62747324

The treasure behind Görlitz’s age-old walls (Q62747324): Blogpost: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable Gymnicus (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Oppose Translation of Görlitzer Schätze hinter dicken Mauern (Q62747791) and as these are a source they probalby cannot be merged, but if this cannot be merged, this translation surely should not be deleted. Even if they could be deleted, no action would be required here. - сyсn - (talk • contribs • logs) 18:24, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, WMF blog posts generally seem to be notable here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q67939086

Q67939086: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable. Gymnicus (talk) 15:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Keep, WD:N#2. As a blogpost by a recognized chapter, it meets that criteria IMO. There are a bunch of research articles with their own items, too. COI disclosure: As of today, I serve as a trustee at Wikimedia Czech Republic. Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to meet the notability requirements. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:43, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q20202034

Paul Clarke (Q20202034): English event and portrait photographer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable. The fact that he was the photographer at conferences makes him not relevant from my point of view. Gymnicus (talk) 18:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Keep In use; and the nomination is based on a straw man. Notability is not asserted on the basis of being "the photographer at conferences". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep People keep nominating Wikidata entries for Wikimedia Commons contributors but it is important to have them. At some point in the future, images at Wikimedia Commons that are under a creative commons license will fall into the public domain and be free of the creative commons attribution restrictions. We need information on the contributor now, so that people in the future can calculate 70 years after their death. --RAN (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
- This reasoning would be the end of notability criteria for living persons. Just upload any picture to Commons, et voilà, you get a Wikidata item. --Emu (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Then argue for a de minimus, a minimum number of entries before you get a QID, my point about copyright expiration is a valid one. --RAN (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): But then every photographer still has a right to an item. Also for example the photographer Thomas Kube from Grimma or the photographer Stefan Sauer from Stralsund. Or are they not entitled because they do not upload their images to Wikimedia Commons? --Gymnicus (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Are we running out of QID numbers? I thought there was an infinite number of them. --RAN (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- In that case we do not need this page. We do not need notability guidelines. Let us give an item to whoever wants one... E4024 (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep Do not confuse Wikipedia notability criteria with Wikidata. These deletion requests are frustrating and misguided. Data is structured data is needed for a variety of legitimate uses on projects or because of a structural need. --Smallison (talk) 17:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to meet the notability requirements. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q105768200

WikiWorld (Q105768200): online nonfiction comic based on short summaries of English Wikipedia articles: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable Gymnicus (talk) 18:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Part of en:Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiWorld and created in cooperation with the Wikimedia Foundation, so much rather notable than not. --Wolverène (talk) 06:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done, at least has a Commons link and a structural need at Greg Williams (Q21167569). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108461452

Wikidata Curious Facts (Q108461452): Wikidata Analytics system to detect anomalies in the Wikidata ontology: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same reasoning as https://www.wikidata.ryancray.com/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions#Q108422230 So9q (talk) 11:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done Seems to be sufficiently notable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q64520596

Q64520596: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 21:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done Seems notable, has Commons category. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q62747791

Görlitzer Schätze hinter dicken Mauern (Q62747791): Blogpost: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, only other link is similar and has a RfD So9q (talk) 12:50, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done, Wikimedia blog posts generally seem to be notable enough to include. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q48556610

Wikimedia Research Newsletter, September 2017 (Q48556610): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There is no recognizable relevance. In the data object where the data object is linked, you can also use the property described at URL (P973). You don't need an extra entry for the blog post. --Gymnicus (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, Wikimedia blog posts generally seem to be notable enough to include. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q23041474

Q23041474: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 20:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

(

Keep come up with a way to keep/delete the over 1,000 Wikimedians listed as questionable, rather than ad hoc deletion. --RAN (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete. N/N. --E4024 (talk) 01:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete lacks info on notability --- Jura 14:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108561794

Q108561794: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable. As far as I know, as a pure Wikicommons photographer you don't get relevant. --Gymnicus (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108461277

Q108461277: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable. I also don't see that the data object will become relevant through Silvan Heintze's participation in the Data Quality Days 2021. --Gymnicus (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108275558

Dicare Tools (Q108275558): website hosting several Wikimedia tools: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, structural need. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q105751022

Denelezh (Q105751022): tool that provides statistics about the gender gap in the content of Wikimedia projects: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to meet notability. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108311072

BnF To Wikidata (Q108311072): import sourced data from BnF (Bibliothèque nationale de France) into Wikidata: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done seems to meet notability. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107699764

Suyash Dwivedi (Q107699764): Indian Wikimedia contributor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Not done seems to meet notability, has a commons category. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107490429

Q107490429: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 09:58, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107388126

Lucas Prégaldiny (Q107388126): Lingua Librist in Residence: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

no relevance recognizable --Gymnicus (talk) 09:59, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Within scope as per statements related to Wikimedian in residence (Q3809586) --Poslovitch (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Delete lacks info on notability --- Jura 11:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done structural need through Wikimedian in residence (Q3809586). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q106526580

Q106526580: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Q106527044: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Another likely hoax by User:Kriestovo Nysian/User:Sibinia. No evidence such a person existed. Manuscript page cited as a source is obviously unrelated. --Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Removed the link, it was just the one hoax page referring to the other. Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk) 19:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Done Both deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q18340392

Q18340392: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Subclasses are disambiguation pages with metaphorical or spelling connection to the word "left" PKM (talk) 22:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Comment wouldn't a statement with named after (P138) be sufficient? --- Jura 11:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to be structurally needed by many other items. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108104842

Q108104842: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Aranya (talk) 18:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

make sure to do a google search about the person AlphaCentbot (talk) 11:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

here are some links

https://thewire.in/communalism/uttar-pradeshs-love-jihad-law-is-a-moment-of-glory-for-hindutva-foot-soldiers

https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/state/uttar-pradesh/meerut/action-like-article-370-in-jnu-says-balraj-dungar-in-meerut/articleshow/72143125.cms

https://www.amarujala.com/uttar-pradesh/meerut/conflicting-statement-balraj-dungar-said-only-love-jihad-in-islam-religion

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/meerut/no-fir-no-conversion-but-muslim-man-held-for-love-jihad-probe/articleshow/79648822.cms

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/lucknow/love-jihad-the-social-network-how-interfaith-couples-are-spotted/articleshow/79673008.cms

https://www.opindia.com/2020/12/growing-awareness-about-grooming-jihad-makes-people-vigilant-in-up/ AlphaCentbot (talk) 11:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

just do a quick google search and look at the news section AlphaCentbot (talk) 16:36, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Keep – The preceding unsigned comment was added by AlphaCentbot (talk • contribs) at 16:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC).

Delete mentions in news coverage does not imply notability. Especially the link to the website that is a wordpress default landing page makes me think that the creator of the Item might have a Conflict of Interest. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108727395

MAB 1./507 Husøya (Q108727395): ex-german coastal artillery unit: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Incorrect duplicate of Q11987372. Not suitable for merging. TommyG (talk) 19:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@Sebastian Berlin (WMSE): Do you agree? --Emu (talk) 20:09, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Looks like it's the same, but there are some information that I thinks should be kept. At least "Kulturminne ID" and "heritage designation", and maybe the coordinate position? I'm not sure why it can't be merged, though. Sebastian Berlin (WMSE) (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Question why not merge? --- Jura 11:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Mike Peel, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q68361084

Q68361084: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy --P4K1574N (talk) 11:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

We should consider it with Q89298571 since the two are linked. Fralambert (talk) 21:51, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109186148

Al-Masry Al-Youm (Q109186148): Egyptian newspaper: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Deleted page وسام/Wisam (talk) 19:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Doesn't this data object describe the same newspaper as the data object Al-Masry Al-Youm (Q2829240)? --Gymnicus (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Comment if it's the same, merge them, if this different and paper with a reasonable circulation, keep it even without article. --- Jura 11:37, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Mike Peel, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107987562

Pousada (San Lourenzo) (Q107987562): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Entity mistaken --see Q12398013 in another Property:P131 Maria zaos (talk) 21:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

What's the problem? Aren't they different places? :-m —Ismael Olea (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Mike Peel, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109085291

Q109085291: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability, along with Q109085828 and Q109070335 --Haansn08 (talk) 14:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

dropout is a notable Italian luxury retail store. It has been featured in several magazines such as Forbes, Vice, Business Insider, Hypebeast, Highsnobiety, Affariitaliani and more. It is also verified on Instagram ( https://www.instagram.com/dropout.milano/ ) and VC backed.

Stefano Zeppieri is the CTO of dropout and manages the entire tech stack and marketing strategies of dropout and Outpump, the most notable fashion and streetwear magazine in Italy.

Below some references for both of the subjects.

https://www.affaritaliani.it/milano/dropout-milano-ecco-dove-comprare-esemplari-di-sneaker-esclusive-559470.html

https://forbes.it/2021/10/20/dropout-milano-il-retailer-di-sneakers-che-vuole-scrivere-una-nuova-pagina-nella-storia-dello-streetwear/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sf64YaSx9oY

https://www.highsnobiety.com/p/air-jordan-1-sbb-factory-flaw/

https://www.businessinsider.com/yeezy-mafia-cofounder-creates-math-formula-to-analyze-sneaker-value-2021-2 Stepzepp (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. —MisterSynergy (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment While this is clearly some form of SEO self promotion (if the username is accurate), the company itself appears to be publicly documented in "serious" sources and by association the individuals fulfil a structural need if their link to the company is also described in serious sources (per WD:N). That said I don't see any serious sources used on the actual item claims (social media is not a serious source) and would support deletion if those are not going to be added. --SilentSpike (talk) 21:50, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to meet notability. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q28241627

Q28241627: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is not clear who the person is (source of the original article is not available any more) Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 17:19, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

@Vojtěch Dostál: It’s available here. Seems to be the same guy as VIAF 68104284. -- Emu (talk) 10:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

@Emu I think it might actually be his son or great son (who also competed). Some of the books in the VIAF record were published after his death in 1991. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:06, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

But thanks for the link. Does https://web.archive.org/web/20170113142552/http://www.rallye-vltava.cz/idealni-stopou-rallye-vltava-2015/trat-jizdy/ qualify the item for existence? If yes we can keep it. Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108535577

Ramón Tolentino (Q108535577): Dominican Republic journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable --Lomeno 24 (Contact me here) 09:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems notable, has Commons category. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q89716476

Ðánh giá ve the trang lao dong, phoi nhiem hóa chat và thông gió tai bon tiem làm móng (Q89716476): field study published in 2019: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nonsense, test page. --P.T.Đ (talk) 17:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, doesn't seem to be nonsense or a test page? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109539276

Kaya Joan (Q109539276): multidisciplinary Afro-Indigenous artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 10:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Keep meets Wikidata notability criteria #2 and individual is an artist in Toronto. Item is referenced.--Smallison (talk) 00:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done seems notable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q31189312

Kaynak (Q31189312): village in Arapgir, Malatya, Turkey: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Kavnak should have been Kaynak (Q10778392) --Katpatuka (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Mike Peel, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q23721850

Q23721850: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item, sole sitelink is a redirect * Pppery * _{... ...} 17:50, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109562196

Tyga Sparta (Q109562196): Zimbabwean internet entrepreneur, hacker, founder and creator of zimmagazine and zimbotube: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable, possibly promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Keep I suppose the reason for this request is that I did not add enough references when creating the data, which I will do shortly after. This item subject is in the Hackers category, which is unlikely to receive much publicity, but despite being in that category, it has multiple mentions in very well-known newspapers, and I think that's what makes it notable. Please take your time to view these links [1] [2] [3][4][5] I think the rest i will just reference them to the item.The subject certainly doesn't qualify criteria 1 of wikidata notability but it does qualify on criteria 2.Thank you. Clicktab (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done Borderline, but seems to have sufficient references to justify notability. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q67908206

Anirban Sengupta (Q67908206): author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability. Also redirect: Q108945755. --Андрей Романенко (talk) 03:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to have a structural need. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109546657

Q109546657: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I cannot verify this person to be a "congresswoman" of Liberia and no references are given. See this list. --Haansn08 (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109558014

Q109558014: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Yahya (talk) 14:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Remove Not notable Cloud.prince (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Cloud.prince has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. whym (talk) 13:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109525845

Q109525845: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Yahya (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Remove Not notable Cloud.prince (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- Cloud.prince has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. whym (talk) 13:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109417170

Q109417170: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross wiki spam by globally blocked LTA. (When all sitelink get deleted, please than delete thia item). আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@আফতাবুজ্জামান: Are Mizanur Rahman Aryan (Q64343766) and Q109417170 one and the same person? If so, then the question of relevance does not arise at all. --Gymnicus (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

@Gymnicus: They are different person. Mizanur Rahman Siyam (Q109417170) is not same as Mizanur Rahman Aryan (Mizanur Rahman Aryan (Q64343766)) or Mizanur Rahman Sayed (Mizanur Rahman Sayed (Q6884594)). --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 03:34, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

@আফতাবুজ্জামান: Thanks for the clarification. I didn't even notice this difference yesterday. I have already noticed why and have reversed the suspected vandalism in the English language Wikipedia. --Gymnicus (talk) 12:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q73911356

Q73911356: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: please do not blank an item before nominating an item for deletion. The fact that it has a sitelink is an important part of deciding if it should be deleted. If you had a reason for removing the link you should give it here. BrokenSegue (talk) 04:04, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@BrokenSegue: The sitelink was just a redirect left after the article had been merged at fawiki. Do you keep such pages? 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:08, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: typically though not always if a page is merged we merge the wikidata items also. Sometimes we would also keep a distinct item if it represents a separate concept. I don't speak farsi so I cannot check to see if a merge should be done here. Sounds like a delete should not be done though (though in reality it doesn't matter). BrokenSegue (talk) 15:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108388936

Q108388936: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fake person[6]. --Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 17:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108661304

Farren Morgan (Q108661304): British actor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Comeon J (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to be needed for structural reasons. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109332221

Q109332221: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax. Bluemask (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q8075187

Q8075187: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a notable person User:Veracious ^(•‿•)^ 06:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Eh, they seem pretty notable to me, or at least are identifiable in a number of formal databases. Yitzilitt (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 21:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q100253304

Q100253304: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet WD:Notability, it originally linked to a wikipedia article, but that wikipedia article no longer exists after failing to meet wikipedia's general notability guidlines (WP:GNG), after the merger it now redirects to a separate wikipedia article (Racism in Canada). The links left for this entry are now redirects and translations, and per WD:Notability those do not count towards establishing notability. --CASalt (talk) 04:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Comment Just the deletion on enwiki don't mean that this is not notable. We have our own WD:N who are distinct of enwiki. The item have sitelink to 5 other wikis, so this is notable by criterion #1. Fralambert (talk) 01:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

@CASalt If it help, I asked for the deletion of the article on frwiki. Fralambert (talk) 01:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

@Fralambert OK that definitely makes more sense than my reading of WD:Notability and the reference to translations pages in the subparagraph 1(1). Well I guess in that case, I guess this is stuck here for now. These articles were spammed by a notorious sockpuppet/troll on en-wikipedia, probably through google translate. Hopefully more people from those language wikipedias take notice and remove the articles CASalt (talk) 14:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

You can alway ask for deletion on other wikis, like I done on frwiki. The template Delete work on most wiki and you can ad you reason in english. Fralambert (talk) 16:15, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

As there are articles in some wikis, it can't be deleted. Without it, maybe it's more suitable as a lexeme: definitions vary and extent of uses isn't clear to me. --- Jura 11:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

'UPDATE': I've requested deletion on German, Spanish, and Japanese wiki. However I've run into a problem on Mandarin wiki, it's spam filter seems to think I'm a bot or something, and is preventing me from proposing deletion. So if anyone here would be kind enough to propose the deletion of chinese version, that would be nice CASalt (talk) 20:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done Come back here after the Wikipedia articles have been deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Lexeme:L300661

invalid ID (L300661): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is a form already included in the lexeme (L300659) --Hameryko (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, los != el. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Lexeme:L300660

invalid ID (L300660): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is a form already included in the lexeme (L300659) --Hameryko (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, la != el. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Lexeme:L300662

invalid ID (L300662): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is a form already included in the lexeme (L300659) --Hameryko (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, las != el. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109754330

David Carson (Q109754330): French musician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Repeat spam Snackmurat (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done, has a Commons category that would need to be deleted first. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:37, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q65029855

John Trevena (Q65029855): lawyer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Uploaded by someone blocked on Wikipedia. It was determined that the article should not mention the guy's arrest or show his mugshot. It is not used on any Wikipedia or other project. --Dream Focus (talk) 00:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Not done has a sitelink. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:32, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108532720

Q108532720: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, spam, Advertising Comeon J (talk) 08:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, has a sitelink that would need to be deleted first. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109915066

Q109915066: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable; also see multiple anonymous editors on Q54806734 ⚊⚊ DCflyer (talk) 00:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109652947

Q109652947: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. — Afeef (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q108881253

Slim & I – Original Documentary Soundtrack (Q108881253): 2020 compilation soundtrack album; various artists: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not sure what to make of this BrokenSegue (talk) 19:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems notable through the links. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q3561991

Q3561991: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redir --- Jura 08:13, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done @Jura1: redirect to where? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109887922

Q109887922: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability Haansn08 (talk) 10:09, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Comment: https://thebridge.in/esports/mortal-streamer-of-year-runner-up-esports-awards-2021-26896 -- CptViraj (talk) 12:38, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q64875536

Wikimedia disambiguation page (Q64875536): type of wiki page usually in main namespace (article namespace, ns=0) containing links to articles with similar names, and very little details only, use with P31 "instance of": (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

According to the item's talk page it has been created to contain the propery "default description for instances" that has been rejected FF-11 (talk) 19:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

np --- Jura 19:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Done Redirect created by User:Mike Peel, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109930785

Q109930785: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 11:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109930802

Q109930802: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109930810

Q109930810: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109930816

Q109930816: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109931390

Q109931390: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, likely self-promotion. Xezbeth (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109969562

Q109969562: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion. Xezbeth (talk) 13:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request of page created by user:Rosheedpanel

Q109352549 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109388812 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109580547 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109583507 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

All of these seem spam or are no totable. --Fralambert (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC) Fralambert (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Done Deleted. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q109691966

Q109691966: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Orphan, not notable Estopedist1 (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107006513

Q107006513: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet notablity policy, created in self promotion. ✗plicit 02:31, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107316376

Q107316376: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Wolverène (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107531222

Q107531222: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Wolverène (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107529323

Q107529323: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Wolverène (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107528656

Q107528656: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Wolverène (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107528038

Q107528038: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Wolverène (talk) 05:21, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q110038976

Caserma Bortolussi (Q110038976): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. AramilFeraxa (talk) 13:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Keep barracks are generaly notable. Fralambert (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems notable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q102429177

Basshunter's musical style (Q102429177): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

"Basshunter's musical style" no sitelinks; deletion request part of Basshunter/Eurohunter cleanup, --- Jura 11:07, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, sitelinked to enwiki and has a link from another item here. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:58, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: SEO specialists

Q108554404 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109246326 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109623643 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109647707 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q109653461 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q108487378 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q108487291 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q108134922 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q108104893 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q110128187 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Notability Haansn08 (talk) 05:04, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Comment Q108487378 have a Vikidia link. Fralambert (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Not sure about Q108487291 since it's the creator of Q108487378. Fralambert (talk) 02:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Done All deleted now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:56, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q110192810

Q110192810: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is an empty item, since a different one was created, which has Wikipedia entries and statesments. Also, it was not possible to carry out a merge, so a deletion is promoted. --Alejito2016 (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

Q65032665 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q65032707 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q65032725 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q65032750 (delete | history | links | logs)
Q65032775 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

non-notable musical group and its members with barely more than a Facebook page; Q65032665 contains phony record labels to make item appear legitimate Quesotiotyo (talk) 02:02, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Done All deleted as non-notable. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:26, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q11139128

Q11139128: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Sitelink moved, shouldn't be repurposed --- Jura 02:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q42310114

Diana Felsenheimer (Q42310114): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet the notability policy, Sister of a well-known personality with no relevance of her own. HarryNº2 (talk) 02:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Not done, seems to be a structural requirement for Bela B (Q77462). Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q107449228

Q107449228: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? — Afeef (talk) 05:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Mike Peel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q110252181

Q110252181: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

14x+ re-creation of deleted non-notable item Jamie7687 (talk) 12:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 20:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q110253112

Q110253112: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable - recreation by cross wiki spammer see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mghghoffic/Archive - previously Q110196569 deleted yesterday (and I believe Q110051967, Q110051799, Q109443238 and Q109413470) - this user is only here to promote themselves KylieTastic (talk) 12:35, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

@KylieTastic I deleted and warned the user, since they recreate the same item, I will start a RfA about Official1368. Fralambert (talk) 19:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 19:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Q110253334

Q110253334: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

An item that is not gaining importance or fame, it is not a computer scientist, it is only trying to promote itself, this item was previously omitted and is of no importance. Osps7 (talk) 12:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)