Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2023/10/31
![]() |
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Minecraft YouTuber (Q120122399): digital creator who creates video content related to the game Minecraft: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Merge with Q17125263 Trade (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Minecraft as this is within their scope. —Tomodachi94 (he/him · talk) 19:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Comment I support this item being deleted, but maybe we should migrate all humans with this item to have field of work (P101) set to 'Minecraft YouTube' or similar? —Tomodachi94 (he/him · talk) 20:30, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep Minecraft YouTuber is a pretty popular descriptor for people online. Its fandom is also on Wikidata MCYTTWT (Q106626500), and it has a category on English and Farsi Wikipedia. There are other types of YouTubers as well. I added a Know Your Meme ID. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 20:40, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- Minecraft YouTuber is weirdly a distinct occupation, similarly to how beauty YouTuber (Q23680154) is a distinct occupation, so I'm leaning keep. SWinxy (talk) 22:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
- We dont need a seperate item for every single video game popular among YouTubers Trade (talk) 22:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Keep We don’t. But “Minecraft YouTuber“ is hardly yet another random genre, there’s like a gazillion articles in the German and English language press alone talking specifically about “Minecraft YouTubers“ (in various spelling variants). That’s WD:N #2 notability. --Emu (talk) 18:16, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- We dont need a seperate item for every single video game popular among YouTubers Trade (talk) 22:31, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: The nominator makes a serious error. Minecraft YouTuber is a distinct conceptual entity mentioned in numerous places at varying levels of prominence throughout the internet. Jack4576 (talk) 13:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep; appears to be specifically linked from 81 items, so I think it's reasonable to keep as distinct. Jamie7687 (talk) 18:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment I'm skeptical that there has to be a "XYZ YouTuber" for every possible genre of YouTube video. I agree with Tomodachi94's proposal to move to using field of work or similar property (genre?) to indicate the primary topic of their videos. That is a better model. -- William Graham (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep like other popular subclasses of YouTuber. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 14:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not deleted Notable, consensus to keep. Fralambert (talk) 23:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q26954987: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Redundant. Use Q95074 instead Trade (talk) 14:34, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:40, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete I removed its uses on character items. See also discussion at Wikidata_talk:WikiProject_Fictional_universes#character_from_a_certain_fictional_universe - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 08:58, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q113502322: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Am I missing something? There’s quite some coverage on Google News. --Emu (talk) 13:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- I did not search for, the item just appears to be quite vacant and without any sources. --Dorades (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Dorades: Does Wikidata not have a standard of WP:BEFORE?StarTrekker (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know of such a policy. If I overlooked something, I'm happy to adopt my edits accordingly. --Dorades (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- On English Wikipedia WP:BEFORE refers to actions one can take before putting something up for deletion, mainly searching for information and double checking. From what I can gather Wikidata does not seem to have the same system, but I think its a pretty good thing to do.StarTrekker (talk) 11:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- @StarTrekker There are those who advocate for the exact opposite: Shifting the burden of proof onto the item’s creator, i. e. deleting anything that doesn’t have references that are proof of notability. Given that it only takes seconds to create an item on Wikidata and it sometimes takes hours to make sense of such items, this idea could have some merit. --Emu (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu I have always been more of an inclusionist than a deletionist, so I'm not bound to support such a reform on Wikipedia or Wikidata, but if it was to be introduced on Wikidata I would propose that Wikidata started to demand people create an account to create items (like on English Wikipedia) which would reduce careless item creation and that there were always notifications to item creators.StarTrekker (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t know. It’s single purpose accounts that create the most work for me as an admin. --Emu (talk) 11:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu Fair, I'm not an admin so I can't relate to the kind of issues you have to deal with.StarTrekker (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Not deleted See notable by new coverage only, but adding some sources would be welcome. Fralambert (talk) 23:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu Fair, I'm not an admin so I can't relate to the kind of issues you have to deal with.StarTrekker (talk) 16:06, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t know. It’s single purpose accounts that create the most work for me as an admin. --Emu (talk) 11:46, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu I have always been more of an inclusionist than a deletionist, so I'm not bound to support such a reform on Wikipedia or Wikidata, but if it was to be introduced on Wikidata I would propose that Wikidata started to demand people create an account to create items (like on English Wikipedia) which would reduce careless item creation and that there were always notifications to item creators.StarTrekker (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @StarTrekker There are those who advocate for the exact opposite: Shifting the burden of proof onto the item’s creator, i. e. deleting anything that doesn’t have references that are proof of notability. Given that it only takes seconds to create an item on Wikidata and it sometimes takes hours to make sense of such items, this idea could have some merit. --Emu (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- On English Wikipedia WP:BEFORE refers to actions one can take before putting something up for deletion, mainly searching for information and double checking. From what I can gather Wikidata does not seem to have the same system, but I think its a pretty good thing to do.StarTrekker (talk) 11:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know of such a policy. If I overlooked something, I'm happy to adopt my edits accordingly. --Dorades (talk) 16:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Dorades: Does Wikidata not have a standard of WP:BEFORE?StarTrekker (talk) 21:36, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- I did not search for, the item just appears to be quite vacant and without any sources. --Dorades (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Erfan Nouraee (Q121352105): Iranian inventor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Wikidata:Notability Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
- Won a bronze price from the Duke of Edinburgh's International Award in 2022[1]. Fralambert (talk) 01:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Not deleted Notable Fralambert (talk) 23:17, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q115108651: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? — Haseeb (talk) 10:33, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete along with linking item for founder Fei Wu (Q118592495). Jamie7687 (talk) 23:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
François Py (Q121509004): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notability Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 01:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep Quite some (local) coverage, no sign of promotion, does seem notable to me. --Emu (talk) 19:28, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- @emu: The value of the described at URL (P973) statement, which is also being used as source for date of death results in a 404 for me. When I search for him, I only find people with colliding names, not him. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 09:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
- Strange. I can access the page without problems. --Emu (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
Not deleted Notable, have referenced data. Fralambert (talk) 23:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- Strange. I can access the page without problems. --Emu (talk) 11:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
- @emu: The value of the described at URL (P973) statement, which is also being used as source for date of death results in a 404 for me. When I search for him, I only find people with colliding names, not him. -- Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 09:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Q121816357: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? — Haseeb (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
- Along with Q121885898. --Dorades (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete both items. Jamie7687 (talk) 21:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q121746036: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? — Haseeb (talk) 19:23, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Are you marking information as "notable" as spam? Do you have any information about the related company? KisiOlus (talk) 07:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- Spam and notability are not the same. Here, I mean the topic of the item is not notable enough to meet the criteria of WD:N. — Haseeb (talk) 09:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q48229108: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable. Pr. Promotional Kadı Message 18:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete not linked from anywhere anymore because they are also deleted as spam. Tehonk (talk) 00:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Sociedad Española de Mecánica de Rocas (Q20216799): Spanish Society for Rock Mechanics: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted on eswiki+cawiki per notability Brunnaiz (talk) 20:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is linked from two notable members (at present, both with one or more Wikipedia articles) using member of (P463). I'm not sure if that is useful enough be seen as a structural need in the meaning of notability rule 3.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep This item is structurally required to inform about membership of other two items regarding to individuals. --Quetz72 (talk) 21:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Quetz72
Not deleted Notable by #3. Fralambert (talk) 23:27, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q114687015: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unidentifiable French locality --ZandDev (talk) 12:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123246306: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not shown to be notable. As a "freelancer", does not appear to match to any of the academics found when Google searching for the name. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q65550804: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam. CptViraj (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123244240: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable/spam. — Haseeb (talk) 16:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123195504: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam. — Haseeb (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123195494: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam. — Haseeb (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q118127808: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable --Tehonk (talk) 17:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123249722: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Blank BrokenSegue (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Fralambert (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
David Zundelovitch (Q55292080): Israeli sculptor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of Q6562511 --מקף־עברי (talk) 22:00, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Fralambert, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q121745959: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Fralambert (talk) 23:23, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123152566: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Fralambert (talk) 00:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted by Ameisenigel (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 15:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Bulk deletion request
- Q93113458 (delete | history | links | logs)
- Q52772381 (delete | history | links | logs)
- Q99572511 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
notability Tehonk (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted everything -- the items didn't meet the notability criteria. --Wolverène (talk) 12:39, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123257588: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Wikipedia page deleted, no other data Mr.Ajedrez (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123257589: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Wikipedia page deleted, no other data Mr.Ajedrez (talk) 16:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Geraldo de Aquino (Q10289120): Brazilian journalist (1912-1984): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
I believe it fails WD:N. Kacamata (talk) 23:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata Isn’t he the founder of Q10366081? That would probably imply (at least) WD:N #3 notability (“structural need“). --Emu (talk) 23:14, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu According to this article in the pt.WP and this source, the radio station was founded in 1959, and it was acquired by the Fundação Cristã-Espírita Cultural Paulo de Tarso (Paulo de Tarso Cultural Spiritist Christian Foundation) in 1971. Gerardo Aquino is actually founder of this Foundation and not of the radio station. Kacamata (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, but still. Looks notable to me. --Emu (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu If it's notable per WD just keep it. I sourced his birthdate and place. Kacamata (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata Thank you, I think we can indeed
Keep this, but I’ll leave this decision to another admin. Sorry to be annoying, I’m not too familiar with Brazil. --Emu (talk) 08:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu Don't worry. You are not being annoying. I'm still learning, and sometimes I nominate items I believe fails WD:N, but they don't. Kacamata (talk) 18:08, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata Thank you, I think we can indeed
- @Emu If it's notable per WD just keep it. I sourced his birthdate and place. Kacamata (talk) 23:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- Okay, but still. Looks notable to me. --Emu (talk) 17:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Emu According to this article in the pt.WP and this source, the radio station was founded in 1959, and it was acquired by the Fundação Cristã-Espírita Cultural Paulo de Tarso (Paulo de Tarso Cultural Spiritist Christian Foundation) in 1971. Gerardo Aquino is actually founder of this Foundation and not of the radio station. Kacamata (talk) 23:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept, meets criteria 2 & 3. --Wolverène (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Q121432542: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Fails notability, especially criterion #1. I created this item in order to store a single sitelink to a Wikipedia soft redirect, but it has since been converted to a "normal" redirect. Per #1.1, redirects do not count towards notability. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 13:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Q122700420: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Notable? Trade (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123258172: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Mistake YoaR (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Q123208719: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not notable, apparently self promotional. Günther Frager (talk) 14:29, 31 October 2023 (UTC)