Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/Dom bot
From Wikidata
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Approved--Ymblanter (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dom bot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Dom (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s:
- Add properties extracted from the Infobox Election.
Function details:
- The extracted informations are:
Other properties will be added as they become available. --Dom (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Just two comments:
- I would certainly support replacing P173 (P173) with instance of (P31)
- There was a discussion at Property talk:P155#Drop the constraint to creative work on how to use "preceded by" and "followed by". The conlclusion was that they should normally be used as qualifiers. However, I am not sure how that should be done in this case. --Zolo (talk) 06:50, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dom, any updates? Legoktm (talk) 18:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Legoktm, I am not sure to understand your question. Do you mean about the extracted pice of information? --Dom (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was wondering if you had any response to Zolo's comments. Legoktm (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- We a talk (see P173 (P173) - instance of (P31)) with Zolo resulting in the modifications of the property P173 (P173). For follows (P155) and followed by (P156), I think that in the case of the elections there is no need to use it as qualifiers as in the example: 2005 United Kingdom general election (Q428598) is followed by (P156) 2010 United Kingdom general election (Q215622). In this case the 2 items have the same name except the year, which give the order. --Dom (talk) 06:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I was wondering if you had any response to Zolo's comments. Legoktm (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Legoktm, I am not sure to understand your question. Do you mean about the extracted pice of information? --Dom (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, to me, what would be most consistent with Wikidata general logic would be:
And delete the "type of election" property. --Zolo (talk) 09:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Zolo, I don't this is the proper place to speak about that. I suggest to continue this talk on Wikidata talk:Politics infoboxs task force. --Dom (talk) 19:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Are we ready for approval here?--Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dom:--GZWDer (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Currently Dom bot is just adding:
- @GZWDer: As the decisions for the other project are not clear on Wikidata talk:Politics infoboxs task force for the other properties. --Dom (talk) 18:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dom:--GZWDer (talk) 13:53, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]