Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/SPQRobin

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

 Approved I hereby confirm community approval of this request. Awaiting flag assignment by stewards. Vogone (talk) 01:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Flagged by Shanmugamp7. Congrats! Vogone (talk) 07:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SPQRobin

[edit]

Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 01:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello everyone! First of all, some may be wondering why we need a third oversighter, now that we have the data on almost a year of use of OS on this wiki. I'll admit that in terms of oversight activity, things are irregular: some months there is very little, and some months there's quite a few requests. However, speaking for myself, I am no longer as active as I used to be, and since Stryn resigned, we no longer have coverage in European timezones. We believe that adding a third oversighter will add additional coverage, both in terms of differing timezones, as well as for helping us handle requests when matters in real-life call us away, which is starting to happen more often.

Anyway, I would like to co-nominate SPQRobin as our third oversighter. He has been an admin since January August 2013, and is very active on this wiki. He can provide additional coverage for European timezones, and is very active on IRC; also, he is a native speaker of Dutch and has intermediate knowledge of French and German, besides serving on the WMF Language Committee. Finally, he is trusted on Wikimedia as a steward, admin/bureaucrat on Wikimedia Incubator, and also has +2 rights. Thus, I think that he would be a good choice for our third oversighter. --Rschen7754 01:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nomination

SPQRobin is a prolific contributor to Wikidata both adding and maintaining data and performing admin tasks. He is free of controversy, focussing on the important part of the project, and has experience with advanced tools such as oversight as a steward. I think he is an excellent choice for oversight rights. We could use another! Ajraddatz (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate acceptance

I accept the nominations. I think I can help indeed, as a European, with the oversight task. Thank you Rschen7754 and Ajraddatz for nominating me! :) FYI, I might be not that available in the first week of the RfP (to e.g. answer questions), but I will have more time in the second week. SPQRobin (talk) 01:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

[edit]
  1. Support - First! (See co-nomination) Ajraddatz (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Rschen7754 01:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Third lol. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 02:04, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support ofc! — by Revicomplaint? at 02:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --AmaryllisGardener talk 03:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support Saw him at Wikimania. On top of what's been said above, I think he's also a great person in general!--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support--GZWDer (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support, Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:06, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support of course! -- Bene* talk 11:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support If he can be trusted to be a steward, he can obviously be trusted with the lower-level position of oversighter. --Jakob (talk) 13:42, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support Cbrown1023 talk 14:40, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support. Glaisher [talk] 16:37, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Yes! FuzzyDice (talk) 18:21, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Rzuwig► 20:31, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support — ΛΧΣ21 20:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support Armbrust (Local talk - en.WP talk) 22:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support No reason not to. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:37, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  19. support DerHexer (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support Good user. Alan (talk) 09:36, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support for technical competence. --Gryllida 13:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support Chrumps ► 17:32, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Lymantria (talk) 15:12, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support. Allan J. Aguilar (Ralgis) 22:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Matěj Suchánek (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Trusted user. - Taketa (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support. --Dereckson (talk) 22:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Komt wel goed toch? Natuur12 (talk) 22:21, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support - QuiteUnusual (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support ---- Brackenheim 13:28, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Oversight/SPQRobin&oldid=157368389"