Wikidata talk:Database reports/identical birth and death dates

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Status (21 September 2015)

[edit]

--- Jura 04:21, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Status (22 September 2015)

[edit]
  • To check/sort: 100 (mostly date corrections about to be removed by the bot)
  • Article merges todo at Wikipedia: 112
  • False positives: 300

--- Jura 16:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Status (23 September 2015)

[edit]
  • To check/sort: 9
  • Article merges todo at Wikipedia: about 140
  • False positives: 294

There were 3 new entries today, 6 yesterday. --- Jura 08:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Status (30 September 2015)

[edit]

There were 5 new entries today. --- Jura 14:59, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And how about same person with different birth dates in different wikis?

[edit]

e.g. Clarisse Yeung (Q24833347) and Clarisse Yeung (Q21565065), actually both are pointing to the same "Clarisse Yeung", but one says she was born in 1986, and another says 1987. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jura1: Can you answer me about it? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:42, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
User:Pasleim/projectmerge is labels based: User:Pasleim/projectmerge/zhwiki-zh yuewiki has the pair.
If the DOB was identical and had day-precision, it would be on User:Josve05a/dupes (items for living people with identical dates of birth and labels).
--- Jura 06:04, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't help, as I'm too hard to verify the preferences on both articles due to Great Firewall (Q5370363).
Maybe users who edited both could help on it? @Meracritus, 圍棋一級, Hijk910, Tombus20032000, Wpcpey, Liu116: @Brianonly, Kameyou, Ilovesnsdsnsdsnsd, Yanheichu, Jason6698:? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:49, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If both items are about the same person, you can merge them. It's possible to have several DOBs. It's not necessary to figure out which date gets what rank. Here I added three dates.
--- Jura 00:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Status (21 April 2018)

[edit]

Looks like we got to the bottom of it once more. Currently there are just:

  • Can be merged: 0
  • Sitelink conflicts: 1 (should disappear shortly)
  • Sitelink conflicts, marked to merge: 1 (should disappear shortly)

Obviously, the lists of identified duplicates and virtual twins keep growing.

Thanks for your help!
--- Jura 15:33, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]